Originally Posted by
ScatterX
Since TSORon hasn't returned to explain what I had
obviously mischaracterized and
grossly misinterpreted about
theoretical and
hypothetical people, I guess I'll have to go with my eyewitness account, even though it is
notoriously unreliable and
biased (just ask the unbiased apologist
that works for TSA
and didn't see the event in the first place
).
As I recall, our resident TSA apologists claimed that
Nancy Campbell was groped probably because they missed screening her at the checkpoint, not because it was a random gate search.
Yet here we are when this is being done in spades to many people at the gate. I guess that was more dis-information from those folks. Anything for a temporary advantage. Like calling an eyewitness wrong without any proof.