Originally Posted by
Capita1ist
I could be wrong but I think that just means you could go direct from WAS-LAX or connect through one of the other options BOS/PHL/CLT etc.
In other words a connection isn't required.
Hmm, so for the same example:
WAS-WAS/PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX
The routings available just from that line of text are WAS-LAX, WAS-PHX-LAX, WAS-PHL-LAX, WAS-CLT-LAX, or WAS-BOS-LAX but it doesn't mean WAS-WAS-LAX?
That seems counter intuitive to me. Why wouldn't it just be filed as two different routings?
WAS-PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX
WAS-LAX
Ahh, and just after posting I read BryanIAH's response regarding the regional divisions. That makes sense if it's just a general string of airports that is added rather than created individually for each fare.
Thanks!