Originally Posted by
Ambraciot
Slightly adjusting the topic:
What does the provision of the Chilean government's approval that requires LAN and TAM to open their FF programs to other airlines mean for oneworld?
It really doesn't mean that much, as there is little if any competition on the routes mentioned by the provision.
In theory, G3 could take advantage of it, but I suspect the Brazilian govt would have something to say about that. Based on stated routes like MVD-SCL, Pluna (PU) could make such a request.
Originally Posted by
Ambraciot
If smaller rivals participate in the program, would they be treated as oneworld affiliates?
It would probably be in LA's interest to make them affiliates as they could provide feed to LANTAM/OW and vice-versa. However, I see nothing in the provision that says LA is under obligation to do so.
Participating in LANPass and being an affiliate are two different things. For instance, OpenSkies(EC) participates in BAEC, but is not a OW affiliate member.
Originally Posted by
Ambraciot
Is this provision meaningful or can LATAM make up whatever participation requirements and conditions they want, effectively closing the program to outside airlines?
The provision does state that..
If ... an airline ... ask to participate in the Frequent Flyer Program of Latam, the latter shall extend for five years all those benefits. "
Based on that, I would imagine that LA has little ability to restrict participation of any airline that qualifies under the stated provision.