FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - EK falling standards :(
View Single Post
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 11:04 am
  #15  
Sheikh Yerbooty
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Europe
Programs: Yeah, well, don’t really care anymore
Posts: 1,143
I'm relatively new to EK and have never flown QR. Must say that I'm very dissatisfied with the hard product on EK, specifically the huge differences. My first flight was on a -300ER with the fancy business class seats, and apart from the horrible decor it is a very comfortable seat/bed. Connected directly to a -300 non-ER with the regional C-class, and what a contrast that is! Still, for a 4 hour daytime flight it's quite ok, but apart from a crappy seat you also get a crappy folding out screen instead of the 20+ inch.

Next flight was on a -300 non-ER, which seemed to have a seat closer to the new C-class on the ER, but not quite. Could be wrong though, I was tired at that point. I connected in DXB to a an A330 and boy was I in for a shock - I mean, does anybody else do 2-3-2 business class seating on an Airbus? Screen size was small, quality was crap and the seat was a joke.

Last flight was a redeye from Europe to DXB on a -300ER, but one fitted with the horrible regional C-class seats. To say I was disappointed would be an understatement, and I'm glad I chose to depart a day early; the regional seat is simply impossible to catch a decent sleep in.

Haven't tried the A380 yet and, frankly, I'm unlikely to fly EK ever again unless they standardise their seats.
Sheikh Yerbooty is offline