Originally Posted by
Ancien Maestro
Seems a bit over the top.. when even in theory, its impossible to pin down responsibility on AC, to have AC responsible..
The explosion part is not used in the context above.. you are misquoting me.. What I'm saying is that the issue at hand has caused strife to OP to change his flying habits.. the issue in itself is explosive.. that caused his explosion (explosive) decision..
This will be my last reply as you seem to enjoy these types of back & forth exchanges that run off at a tangent to the topic.
I'm not misquoting you, just disagreeing with your use of hyperbole in the choice of the term "explosive" as IMHO OP cooly and rationally opted to make a change after a long period of reflection and no doubt much thought and that hardly seems explosive. Using that term seems a bit over the top.
Originally Posted by AC854
No doubt Mr Million Miler can look after himself and does not need me in that regard but. . . . .it is apparent that Mr MM's real beef here is not the $122 - rather it is the manner in which various levels of AC personnel dealt with him and his concern. From my reading of events it appears that each level dealt with the info on the table at the time with no one researching who they were dealing with. Being an SE is one thing but being an MM'er is entirely something else. In my world it would take just seconds to bring up a clients profile.
Yes, I agree completely and said as much upthread:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/16921049-post31.html