Originally Posted by
SATTSO
What are you talking about? In one thread, people are saying this will only be good if they get special benefits from this program by being able to leave their shoes on, etc. In the other thread, people are saying these benefits are horrible. They are not different. Please read before you respond. Thanks.
I was clarifying the previous post, which was clearly beyond your comprehension. Both of the statements you are alluding to can be true.
1. Everyone should be screened the same way and by offering benefits to certain groups it makes things worse for everyone else, and that screening shouldn't be the current scope and grope.
2. The new program will provide meaningful benefits to those who participate because it will bring screening closer to to what it
should be, for everyone and every additional person who can avoid the current sexual assaults is a good thing.
Saying "here's how to make the program attractive to those eligible to join, even though offering it is discriminatory and opens up other potential problems" isn't contradictory, it's just stating two separate facts.