FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Excessive (?) schedule padding on UA?
View Single Post
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 3:07 pm
  #16  
espostor
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1K, DL Gold, Marriott Amb
Posts: 360
Originally Posted by mherdeg
Especially out of JFK, it seems like having some thunderstorm/ATC buffer time is a really good idea.
Same can be said for SFO, just replace "thunderstorm" with "fog/low ceiling/too-close-for-comfort parallel runways".

Of all the routes that UA does do some serious padding on, JFK<>SFO is probably the most justified. ORD<>LGA is a close second.

Also, in fairness, if you compare the block times to the actual flight times of routes that aren't as susceptible to weather/ATC delays, they are usually much closer together. DEN-MEM is one that I take just about weekly. I can't recall the flight ever departing or arriving more than +/- 10 minutes from scheduled, with the lone exception being a recent 3+ hour delay due to weather across the top of the country from Chicago to the east coast.
espostor is offline