FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - EK undermining the A345
View Single Post
Old Jan 6, 2011 | 2:17 am
  #4  
ung1
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: QR Plat | SK Diamond | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,612
Originally Posted by LH/LX
SQ is using the A345 on the EWR-SIN and LAX-SIN routes and they are very happy with their performance and fuel efficiency ! EY is in the same position too.
Since they'd bought them, they had to use them. EK grew at a pace where they could order enough 77Ls. In the case of SQ, they removed P. Eco (though I'm not entirely sure about the reason for doing so), and the all business layout means the revenues are enough to cover the higher operating costs. As for EY, they operate too few routes to be able to do this.

Also keep in mind that because EK squishes in an extra seat in Y on the 777s, the aircraft type brings in more revenue. They can also carry more pax, so the decision may also have been based on higher loads.

I recall reading about this somewhere, but I'm not entirely sure of what all the reasons were.
ung1 is offline