Originally Posted by
doober
A poorly written article and the photo of the image on the outside of the machine is misleading as there are no machines in the US with that type of image (although supposedly one has been tested at BOS).
Agree. Factually wrong (comparison of x-ray radiation to cell phones, etc), errors in grammar and punctuation, and poorly researched. (Although I love "an even more evasive pat down will be administered."

)
Brian, sweetie, I hope you're not majoring in engineering, science, English, journalism, political science...
Oh, look

: