Originally Posted by RichardKenner

That's an interesting one because it focuses on specific individuals, each with a different issue which is not faced by the general public, essentially making the medical privacy argument. I think that has the best chance of success because it's making a stronger argument than a generic 4th Amendment argument. Here, you're saying very precisely what's being lost by these people. By bringing religion into it, this also invokes the 1st Amendment, though I suspect that particular argument won't prevail.