Originally Posted by
eyecue
What you see is not what you get. I have said this before there is no benefit to sending someone that is gorgeous to the ait. You cant see the features of the beauty in detail. There is no identity. There is nothing erotic or sensual about it. The gesture that you saw could have meant a lot of things but you said yourself that she had leggings on. That was one reason right there.
Any chance you could post a photo? No one would have to know your identity. You could post it from an internet cafe using Tor. Can't you see the absurdity of claiming that the photos are not revealing when their release is completely verboten?
I disagree that there is nothing erotic or sensual about the photos (that I have seen). I find the backscatter x-ray ones very erotic. They remind me of black and white nude art photos. Except they are even better because they are non-consensual. It's more exciting that way. And being the perverted male geek that I am I have even been researching the idea of trying to build a backpack or car-mounted backscatter x-ray machine. Every boys dream is a working pair of x-ray glasses and now it is technologically feasible to carry around a machine that actually does see under women's clothes. I think the technology is totally awesome. Also the claim that the viewer doesn't care about what the woman looks like is totally ridiculous. Just imagine yourself walking around with a pair of x-ray glasses. Which would you prefer looking at? A strikingly beautiful 16 year old girl, or an overweight 50 year old guy? To even ask the question is to answer it. You might not be able to distinguish which faces are pretty, but you can certainly distinguish male from female and nice bodies from ugly bodies. On your shift your friend puts the hottest chicks in the machine for you and on your shift you do the same for him. It's not really so hard to figure out. If I were working there you can bet I would be doing exactly the same thing.
Having said all that, there does seem to be a huge difference between the mmw images and the x-ray ones. Maybe you work at a checkpoint with mmw images. Hence your confusion. I still don't find the nudity in the mmw images to be acceptable. And they are still "dick measuring devices". But I will admit that the mmw images I saw were a bit too medical looking to be much of a turn on. I'd still love to have a portable model though to literally scope out the chicks. It's not as good as the the x-ray tech, but it would still be exciting.