Originally Posted by
Michilander
I read the OP to suggest that there has to be some level of security at the airport, and that security will be the responsibility of an agency called TSA. So, I think he was suggesting that the existance of TSA is not the problem, the way it is being run (or, more correctly, allowed to run amok) is the problem.
It is a sophistical argument. TSA is the problem BECAUSE of the kinds of approaches it takes to the job it was given. I don't think you can separate the two. Because would TSA be TSA if it went about its job rationally?