Originally Posted by
UA1K4EVER
Are you an EQM or EQS qualifier? If the latter and you still maintain that the higher EQS requirement is "fair" then your capacity for "accommodation" is truly commendable. I have traveled all year and have reached just 47.5 EQS (but over 110K EQM). I cannot imagine doing the equivalent of 25 EQS more (58K more EQM at my rate) to just reach a status that another member in the same program does not have to do anything extra for... (that is the very definition of "unfairness", ain't it?).
Neither. I am a neutral party who gets no credits ever, so am therefore only looking at the numbers in an unbiased way. My question is it fair for a person to need 30 EQS to get 2P when they can do 25k miles, or 60EQS when they can do 50K miles? The relative fairness on them are all equal, as long as one is fair, they all are, but if none are fair, that is a completely different discussion. They are all equally fair or unfair, 1K's will no longer be an exception to the straight ratio graph of plateaus.