Originally Posted by
eyecue
This whole thing is a matter of opinions. When a person whether it is a child or adult, is patted down, the result is dependant on the intent of the officer. Evereyone on here is screaming sexual assault and that is not the intent of the patdown. A properly done patdown does not constitute a sexual assault. There is no lingering or fondling done.
So you can do anything you want as long as your intent is good? Was putting the Japanese in internment camps during World War II just fine because the government had the good intent to protect its citizens? You can justify any action by saying the intention is good, but that doesn't make it so.