Originally Posted by
HeadInTheClouds
There really is no other logical conclusion to draw.
You're assuming UA raised the EQS to 120 merely to eliminate less-profitable fliers; I'm questioning that very assumption, as it just doesn't seem grounded in reality.
Originally Posted by
HeadInTheClouds
Why on earth would they single out a group of more profitable customers for benefit reductions?
Wouldn't be the first time they've done just that...