Originally Posted by reinballe

The information I got out of COInsider's post is that the following statement was incorrect.



The fact that they are still debating E+ need not imply that a complete elimination of E+ is on the table. It could be somethings as simple as what to do with CO metal, or whether new planes should all have E+, or be a mix of with and without E+ like the current fleet.

Don't get me wrong. I hope they adopt UA's configuration of 757, 767, and 777 with great Y/F ratios and E+. But I am not sure I want to see E+ on COs 737s if it mean one less row of F seats.