Originally Posted by
ExpertFlyer Voice
As for the new icons, they are here to stay. We actually kept the color scheme the same as icons representing seats that are in some way available have a white background, whereas seats that are in some way not available have a dark fill or background, just like before. At first, I had the same reaction but after using them for several weeks internally we don't notice a difference and like them better, give it a chance.
Please, hire a good designer to make these decisions for you. Not a "web designer" or a "web developer" or a middle manager who knows what he likes when he sees it. Someone professional who understands how things like color palettes and character kerning work and influence the user experience.
Rather than encouraging users to just "get used to it, we did," find someone who can look at two design alternatives and TELL you which one is better. And back up his statements with research and studies and experience.
At least 3 users have already tried out the new version, expressed their dislike of a specific facet, and offered reasonable explanations for their views. If you want feedback, we would love to give it to you. But to then turn right around and wave off any negative points expressed with a dismissive "they are here to stay" is rather offputting.