Originally Posted by
Scubatooth
well considering your employer has yet to provide real samples, I question just about anything you have to say about the output of these devices.
It's one thing to talk about institutional dishonesty, but entirely something else when somebody says "I saw X" and gets a response of "I don't believe you saw X". That's the same thing as calling a specific individual a liar and I have problems with that. Disputing somebody's interpretation of things or in cases where there might be subtle things mis-remembered is one thing, this is something different.