Originally Posted by
Boggie Dog
Only after being read my rights and being arrested.
There is no reason any person should be treated in a manner that is not openly viewable to the public unless being charged for a crime. Even then I think suspected criminals have more protections than a person who just wishes to travel some place by commercial air.
Something is very wrong in our country when TSA or any other government entity can shake people down without cause!
Refer to my bold above: I would hope that this would have been made clear in the informed consent part. It would include what they suspect, and how they will search and if there is criminal liability involved. I also said "may" reserving the right to terminate the search even the answers are given.
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails View Post
I may permit the private screening under three conditions:
1. I can be told the scope of the upcoming screening so that I can give informed consent. Not as it is progressing. Before it starts.
2. I can have a witness of my choice.
3. My witness will be permitted to take photographic evidence.
Are any of these unfair or not permitted?