TSORon said in post #100:
“What’s to stop putting things inside of bodies, either cavities or otherwise?” In part, there is not enough space in any particular body cavity to put all the components necessary and the amount of explosive necessary to cause catastrophic damage to an aircraft. And in any case, the body itself will absorb a great deal of the energy released by any device small enough to pack in there. As for surgically implanted devices, science fiction.
Well TSORon if there is not enough room in a persons body for a weapon then just why does TSA worry about my size 9 shoes?
Originally Posted by
TSORon
Yeah, I already saw that one. “Dishonest” is the most innocuous term I would apply. “Openly hostile” towards the TSA and its procedures is a bit more accurate. This “person” is hardly an objective observer. About as partisan as Nancy Pelosi, and just about as honest as well.
The person interviewed was not an observer.
They reported a first person occurrence.
Originally Posted by
eyecue
In order to complete the resolution pat down IT HAS TO BE DONE in private. If the passenger declines to move to private screening then the process cannot be completed and the passenger cannot enter the boarding area.
That being said, the APA just recommended that all pilots say they want private screening in all instances involving their people.
What is done during this "Resolution Pat Down" that TSA is afraid of the public seeing?