Originally Posted by
Yaatri
That does not transfer responsibility from DIAL to GoI. If Govt owned AI orders aircraft from Boeing and Boeing delivers shoddy aircraft, which AI accepts, AI/GoI can be blamed for not exercising their oversight authority. But the blame still will go to Boeing for delivering a shoddy product.
It ofcourse does not transfer responsibility and I never meant that.. but what I mean is that in these huge PPP projects ( specially in developing countries), stringent oversight is required which was not the case here.. so there is some blame for them too ..
Originally Posted by
Yaatri
This pure conjecture on your part.
Are we then assuming that there would have been no detailed plans etc etc shared .. Ofcourse this is conjecture but based on normal processes in which projects should and are purpoted to awarded..
Originally Posted by
Yaatri
How does failure of inspectors absolve DIAL and GMR?
It ofcourse doesnt absolve GMR and DIAL in any way.. GMR is completey responsible.. what I mean is if there was proper oversight then the way the final product came out could be better..
Originally Posted by
Yaatri
Unless you manufacture facts, no one has said that regulatory agencies of the Govt had no say. What I am saying is that GMR is primarily responsible for the shoddy construction. If you sell me a shoddy product, you are responsible. I can be faulted for not exercising due caution. But that does not mean you sold a good product. @:-)
We agree on this
[/QUOTE]
That is the crux of the matter. GMR failed to provide a good product.[/QUOTE]
+1
.. Never denied this.. just saying proper monitoring and oversight should have been there and this is where I blame the govt agencies for failing.. but ofcourse this does not absolve DIAL in any manner nor reduce their responsibility..