Originally Posted by
retired captain
As a final thought, allow me to leave you with this question. Who among us, faced with a critical heart condition requiring surgery, would consult a 25 year old heart surgeon? Or who among us, having a brain tumor, would want to have a 26 year old operating on us? Tens of thousands of regional airline passengers do just that each day.
Just thought I would point out I don't really like that analogy, and I've heard it many times. There are a lot more aircraft flying now then 30 years ago. A more appropriate one would be: You have a brain tumor that needs to be operated on soon, you can either wait for the the more experienced doctor, however long it might be, at a unaffordable rate for most people. Or you can get the needed surgery done now by someone who has been trained to do it, but may be younger with the advantage you can actually pay for it. Both will remove the tumor 99.999999% of the time.
There simply isn't enough pilots that can build up 3000 hours before moving onto a regional carrier. 30 years ago, with far fewer commercial flights, it may have been possible. Now, reducing flights and raising fares to 30 years ago would be disastrous to our economy with
no increase in our safety. Flying now is safer then it ever has been before.
I'm not a commercial pilot, but I do think practically and have a lot of knowledge in the field. I do think pilots are underpaid, but it is a free market.