Originally Posted by
BayTalker
Is a 767-300 a good representation of domestic first in terms of general comfort? Honestly, I think I may have slept better with the extra leg room I had in 11H as opposed to the limited leg room (because of the bulkhead) in 1F.
As others have already noted, you were in the worst plane and the worst row for domestic F. I was in 1D on an SFO-IAD red-eye once and while I was very happy to have the u/g, I was desperately missing the legroom of the non-bulkhead seats. There's a reason that you & I landed row 1: we both cleared upgrades at the last minute and *no one* picks those seats ahead of time so they're always the last to go.
I think the only F seats that were worse than the 767 2-class were the 737 F seats (which fortunately are no longer in service). As for the rest of the fleet, I think most people (myself included) really like the Airbus F seats for comfort on the two-class planes (wide-bodies included) and of course if you can snag a Y=>C upgrade on one of the three class wide-bodies you're in good shape. Bulkhead F seats are not good on *any* of the planes (save for the international C sleepers which don't really count).
So in conclusion, I think that you definitely experienced the *worst* that domestic F has to offer (excluding Regional jets of course). Was it worth the 15K?...that's what I spent on my red-eye mentioned above and even with the reduced legroom I still was more than happy to fork it over to stay out of Y on a 4+ hour flight. @:-)