Originally Posted by
JSmith1969
If shoes are a viable threat, why have no planes been brought down by shoe bombs in countries that don't have a mandatory shoe carnival?
If shoes are a viable threat, why were no planes brought down before August 2006, when the shoe carnival was not mandatory?
What is the name of your first grade teacher, and does she know that your reading comprehension is at about the same level as a cocker spaniel's?
My first grade teacher was Mrs. Pegram, and she was a wonderful lady. Personal attacks serve only to further the image that the person dealing them has nothing salient to add to the conversation. Shoes are a viable threat, the fact that they have not been used elsewhere (or here for that matter) is not an indicator as to the viability of the method.