FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - "Liquid explosive" damage on the BBC
View Single Post
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 12:22 pm
  #57  
TSORon
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
Ronnie, while what you said about RFI/EMI, premature detonation, etc (think Japan's Red Army missle detonating outside Narita airport during the 80s), what good would it do to bring down one or two jet airliners? The terrorists, unlike TSA, want results for funding operations and wouldn't risk a major operation on a comercial airliner. The airliners hijacked on 9/11 weren't blown up over a city, instead they were used as guided missles to crash into the twin WTC towers. So the question becomes one of risk/cost benefits regarding TSA funding/SOPs. What level of security is good enough to satisfy TSA?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103
TSORon is offline