FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - "Liquid explosive" damage on the BBC
View Single Post
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 1:18 pm
  #22  
NY-FLA
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate NY or FL or inbetween
Programs: US former CP Looking for a new airline to love me
Posts: 1,694
Originally Posted by gsoltso
Most of the baggage areas have different screening methods and better tech. The equipment in baggage is usually quite expensive, so it can't be placed at all checkpoint areas (although it would be nice wouldn't it?) .....
And you believe the equipment used in baggage at any airport can differentiate between explosive and benign liquids?

It's also really telling that any mention of costs from TSA or individual TSO's comes to what the testing equipment would cost the agency. Apparently the cost to pax of throwing away completely harmless liquids, of buying the airport $4 per bottle "screened" water vice the Albertson's $1.49 a skid brand, of the time spent (and expense to the airlines) of dealing with checked bags that would have been perfectly safe in the cabin is apparently not worthy of mention.
A more rational policy is apparently being implemented with powders. Perhaps someone could consider adapting this to liquids.
NY-FLA is offline