But where, exactly, is the responsibility for that weakness? Sometimes, the weakness is with an individual screener; at that point, the correction (either redemptive or punitive) should be applied to that individual screener. Sometimes, the weakness is with the system, not the players; for example, the Red Team gets a weapon through using known gaps in the system. At that point, disciplining the individual screener is most likely ineffective; you'd be holding a screener responsible for a failure they weren't trained to prevent.

I don't know anything about Red Teams, so I don't know what they're trying to do. But if the purpose of the Red Team is to try to circumvent security procedures ... well, we know that can be done very easily. Heck, a reporter and a self-taught security expert proved it last November.