Originally Posted by
goalie
i think they mean, "since we've failed so many open book (i.e. announced) tests and the numbers make us look bad", maybe we should discontinue the program
I definitely agree that their purpose here is in line with your thoughts.
We can't pass our own test, so it must not be a good test. Let's put a new one in place that we'll call "statistically" relevant and then pat ourselves on the back that we can pass it -- that its useless to verifying anything related to security will be irrelevant, of course