Originally Posted by
TSORon
Nazi. How .... original.
Not Nazi, but Gestapo.
Again, you can put forth all the different numbers you like, but you cannot prove them one way or the other. And neither can I.
As far as the BDO process, you and halls have belief's. Nothing more. The process has not been challenged in court yet, but I'm sure it will. Hey, if you truly are a lawyer, maybe it will be you. But until that happens, the BDO process serves as reasonable belief for additional administrative screening. You can believe otherwise as much as you like, but you can only prove it in a court. Trying to prove it here is like a pastor preaching to the choir. Not an unbiased mind in the lot.
All that you say is true. So tell, TSRon, what was your purpose in posting the article?
However, there is one thing that I do know, having spent enough time in academe: the "studies" as described in the article are bad science. Example: Suppose he found that, whenever a lie was told, people blinked and either inhaled or exhaled. Ipso facto, anyone who blinks and breathes is lying. Do you understand why such a study is meaningless? No control group.