Originally Posted by
Erasmus
I know I'm going to continue to be flamed, but the sense of entitlement around here sometimes is just too much.
Only a corporatist would call assumption of good faith a "sense of entitlement".
If all partners can be ammended both going forward and retroactively, then why should any customer have any faith in anything DL says or does, ever? If I follow the rules of a promotion as put forth by the promoter, the promoter has an obligation to meet the promotion. That does not mean I have a sense of entitlement, it means I trust the corporation to make good on it's own promo.