Originally Posted by
Wally Bird
Oh yes you can. The Supremes do it all the time, and can reverse later (timewise) opinions in favor of earlier ones. They will cite, examine and rule on all pertinent precedents. It would require someone's appeal making it that far of course, but it is entirely possible that Bayless would supercede Wardlow if the Supremes were to consider both in the light of a third case.
When
MikeMpls becomes a member of SCOTUS then that will be a salient point.