"direct" (with stop) credit in new program?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDX
Programs: kayaker
Posts: 851
"direct" (with stop) credit in new program?
I tried searching before posting this, but couldn't find what I was looking for. If I missed it, feel free to point me in the right direction:
As I think most of us are aware, PMUA credited "direct" flights as actual miles flown, so if you flew IAD-SFO-LAX on a single flight number you got two segments and all the miles. Sure, UDU was a problem, but you at least got credit for both. On the PMCO side, however, flights were credited as the equivalent non-stop; the "upside" was that you didn't have to pay the extra $3 in segment taxes and fees.
Does anyone know how the new program will treat direct-marketed flights with stops?
As I think most of us are aware, PMUA credited "direct" flights as actual miles flown, so if you flew IAD-SFO-LAX on a single flight number you got two segments and all the miles. Sure, UDU was a problem, but you at least got credit for both. On the PMCO side, however, flights were credited as the equivalent non-stop; the "upside" was that you didn't have to pay the extra $3 in segment taxes and fees.
Does anyone know how the new program will treat direct-marketed flights with stops?
#2
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Illinois.
Programs: Switched from UA 1K to AA so I could earn EQD's on partners. Mid-tier on most major hotel programs.
Posts: 542
I hope it's actual miles flown, as I've been looking at a similar issue, flying ORD to BKK via NRT. It seems that UA gives the truncated mileage when on the same flight number, but most of what I've read on this question is rather dated. . . so hopefully someone has more up-to-date and good news.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDX
Programs: kayaker
Posts: 851
I hope it's actual miles flown, as I've been looking at a similar issue, flying ORD to BKK via NRT. It seems that UA gives the truncated mileage when on the same flight number, but most of what I've read on this question is rather dated. . . so hopefully someone has more up-to-date and good news.
#4
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDX
Programs: kayaker
Posts: 851
#6
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 5,893
There has been no evidence that we'll use anything but the CO system going forward.
People did report that in the CO reservations system, phone agents are often able to split a direct flight into two segments, which if I understand correctly causes them to post separately, and that you often only have to pay the tax difference (an extra ~$10 segment tax).
This same task is often REALLY HARD under UA fare rules, where direct flights are often used in fare constructions that don't actually allow connections and splitting the flights out causes a reprice and a huge fare difference that UA agents have to collect. (Because mileage credit was per-segment, it wasn't a huge deal these past two years, but direct flights do wreak havoc on upgrades...)
People did report that in the CO reservations system, phone agents are often able to split a direct flight into two segments, which if I understand correctly causes them to post separately, and that you often only have to pay the tax difference (an extra ~$10 segment tax).
This same task is often REALLY HARD under UA fare rules, where direct flights are often used in fare constructions that don't actually allow connections and splitting the flights out causes a reprice and a huge fare difference that UA agents have to collect. (Because mileage credit was per-segment, it wasn't a huge deal these past two years, but direct flights do wreak havoc on upgrades...)
#7
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton GLD, Marriott Plat, NEXUS/GE
Posts: 2,872
This same task is often REALLY HARD under UA fare rules, where direct flights are often used in fare constructions that don't actually allow connections and splitting the flights out causes a reprice and a huge fare difference that UA agents have to collect. (Because mileage credit was per-segment, it wasn't a huge deal these past two years, but direct flights do wreak havoc on upgrades...)
#8
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United Arab Emirates & Arizona, USA
Programs: UA MM/1P, EK Au, QR, TK, Marriott Life Ti, Hilton Dia, IC Dia, Hyatt Glob, Accor Pt, Shangri-La
Posts: 4,526
Good to hear that they changed it. They just started (or will soon start) serving DOH via DXB -- ironically, IAD-DOH is less mileage than IAD-DXB, so I was wondering how they'd handle it.
#9
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Illinois.
Programs: Switched from UA 1K to AA so I could earn EQD's on partners. Mid-tier on most major hotel programs.
Posts: 542
#11
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDX
Programs: kayaker
Posts: 851
FWIW, I booked another one of these tickets today on PMUA metal for 2/28 with a phone rep in order to use some VDB vouchers. While chatting, I asked what the official new policy will be. She put me on hold, checked with the MP desk, and came back and said,
"Credit for direct flights will be given as if they are non-stop. So it doesn't matter if you connect in DEN, ORD, IAD, or all three. It will continue to be as it has always been."
I pointed out that there was a contradiction: this may be the new policy but it is not how things have been recently. She apologized for not knowing definitively and repeated what the MP desk (not the integration desk) had told her. According to the CSR, "The woman at MP told me she's been entering credit for 20+ years and that's how it's always been."
If UA doesn't even know what its own current policy is, how are they going to sort out what the future policy will be?
"Credit for direct flights will be given as if they are non-stop. So it doesn't matter if you connect in DEN, ORD, IAD, or all three. It will continue to be as it has always been."
I pointed out that there was a contradiction: this may be the new policy but it is not how things have been recently. She apologized for not knowing definitively and repeated what the MP desk (not the integration desk) had told her. According to the CSR, "The woman at MP told me she's been entering credit for 20+ years and that's how it's always been."
If UA doesn't even know what its own current policy is, how are they going to sort out what the future policy will be?
#14
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
An significant change is the increased use of direct flights (beleive they are running out of flight numbers and need to re-use flight numbers).
#15
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,866
Why does this result in more direct flight? They can use UA838 for ORD-IAD and SFO-NRT. Since none of the airports are in common, that shouldn't ever result in a direct flight, right?