Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Will UA rebook pax via a connection in Canada during IRROPS?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Will UA rebook pax via a connection in Canada during IRROPS?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:12 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near SEA
Programs: UA MM, AS MVPG75K, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,969
Will UA rebook pax via a connection in Canada during IRROPS?

Wondering if I were booked to fly ORD-SFO and IRROPS hit whether it's possible that UA would ever rebook me ORD-YYC-SFO if I told them I had my passport?

Has anyone ever been routed via Canada during irrops?
bmvaughn is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:22 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: DAL
Posts: 3,400
Even if UA did I don't think CBP would like it or even allow it. It could potentially create a logistical nightmare at Canadian airports in the transborder area.
ual744777sta is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:28 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,438
Well I doubt they would send out a YYC flight from ORD before a SFO flight.
gomike is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:34 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LAS - I'm All In!
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott PP
Posts: 3,639
I don't see why not. CO rerouted me on a bump HNL-NGO-GUM when I was flying HNL-GUM. All I had to have was a passport. That was a good bump. Went from Y to C
trekwars2000 is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:43 pm
  #5  
LAX
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA
Programs: OZ Diamond
Posts: 6,134
Originally Posted by gomike
Well I doubt they would send out a YYC flight from ORD before a SFO flight.
Plus, I figure it would be more likely for UA to route someone through one of its other hubs (ie: DEN & LAX) to allow for more connection possibilities.

LAX
LAX is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:45 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: DAL
Posts: 3,400
GUM has slightly diffrent immigration procedures. But for IRROPS when UA is paying I doubt they will do it especially when Canaidan aviation fees (NAVCAN?) are alot higher than US fees (FAA).
ual744777sta is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:50 pm
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
Originally Posted by gomike
I doubt they would send out a YYC flight from ORD before a SFO flight.
Different equipment.

Originally Posted by ual744777sta
Canaidan aviation fees (NAVCAN?) are alot higher than US fees (FAA).
I don't believe that's based on a per-passenger model, so as long as the plane is flying there should be no additional cost on that front.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 2:57 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,928
During a busy summer travel day in 2006, my LAX-IAD flight was cancelled and all other flights through all other cities were full on both UA and US unless I wanted to fly LAX-SAN-PHX-CLT-IAD.

I found availability on AC, flying LAX-YUL-DCA, but UA refused to put me on those flights. I did score a double upgrade the next morning on UA946, but I did not like arriving a day late.
MatthewLAX is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 3:33 pm
  #9  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
During a busy summer travel day in 2006, my LAX-IAD flight was cancelled and all other flights through all other cities were full on both UA and US unless I wanted to fly LAX-SAN-PHX-CLT-IAD.

I found availability on AC, flying LAX-YUL-DCA, but UA refused to put me on those flights. I did score a double upgrade the next morning on UA946, but I did not like arriving a day late.
The OP is not asking to be interlined-- your case would have required an interline. Apples and Oranges.
Ari is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 3:40 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SFO
Programs: AY Plat, LH FTL
Posts: 7,374
IME, it depends on the agent.

I've been offered some fairly creative re-routes yet some agents simply don't like to take the time (or the perceived risk to their job) to identify or even consider anything but "conventional" routings.

I'm curious to hear about other experiences.
work2fly is online now  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 3:52 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,928
Originally Posted by Ari
The OP is not asking to be interlined-- your case would have required an interline. Apples and Oranges.
UA did not deny my request because of an interline issue, they told me that US-Canada-US flights were not allowed. They had me on hold for ten minutes to "check" this out. Maybe there were just b.s.ing me, but it did not seem like it.

I don't know what the rules are specifically, but try booking LAX-DCA on AC's website and you get this message:

"Air Canada can not travel solely between U. S. cities."

You must book the flights separately; you cannot book a LAX-YUL, YUL-DCA flight together.
MatthewLAX is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 3:54 pm
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
Originally Posted by Ari
your case would have required an interline. Apples and Oranges.
But they offered an interline on UA and US.

Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
"Air Canada can not travel solely between U. S. cities."
See http://www.dot.gov/ost/ogc/subject/f...eCabotage.html. However, this situation doesn't seem to be the same as long as UA is the carrier.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 4:19 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: UA Premier Gold 0.5 MM; BA Silver
Posts: 1,019
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
But they offered an interline on UA and US.


See http://www.dot.gov/ost/ogc/subject/f...eCabotage.html. However, this situation doesn't seem to be the same as long as UA is the carrier.
As I understand it, AC cannot sell a ticket between 2 US cities and UA(or any US carrier) cannot sell a ticket between two Canadian cities. How this works in the real world in terms of which operating carriers work, with codeshares and all, I have no idea.
gbsfo is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 4:19 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
This would be a breach of the Open Skies agreement between the two countries as one cannot transit Canada to get between two US points, nor the US to get between two Canadian points. Also, given American border requirements one would have to have a passport and I doubt many domestic US fliers would carry those with them on a regular basis. US officials would not permit you to transit in the sterile transborder boarding area without preclearing US customs and immigration. You could not just walk off a plane at one gate and line up to board another at the outbound gate.

All that said, I once found it cheaper to buy a pair of weekend discount fares between YYC-DFW and DFW-YYZ to get from YYC-YYZ on CP and AA. However, since each set of tickets was independent of one another, I had no problems even with customs officers when I told them what I was doing. (That was a long time ago, when the Americans weren't so freaked about the border!)
Shareholder is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2009, 4:30 pm
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
Originally Posted by gbsfo
How this works in the real world in terms of which operating carriers work, with codeshares and all, I have no idea.
Codeshares make no difference. Codeshares are a marketing gimmick and (AFAIK) have no legal ramifications except for the Fly America Act.
mahasamatman is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.