4 April - UA497 (MSY-SFO) Makes Emergency Landing at MSY due to Smoke in Cockpit
#61
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Do you want a medal of honor? Sure it was a good job... after all, it is a pilot's JOB to fly the plane, even in reaction to emergencies.... Don't glorify it, it's a good job in the line of duty. If you want to glorify something, put the guys that are fighting IEDs and rogue terrorist cells in Afghanistan, or the rescue workers digging through teetering rubble while facing nuclear exposure and constant 7+ magnitude earthquakes in Japan.
#62
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,123
Do you want a medal of honor? Sure it was a good job... after all, it is a pilot's JOB to fly the plane, even in reaction to emergencies.... Don't glorify it, it's a good job in the line of duty. If you want to glorify something, put the guys that are fighting IEDs and rogue terrorist cells in Afghanistan, or the rescue workers digging through teetering rubble while facing nuclear exposure and constant 7+ magnitude earthquakes in Japan.
As I stated, it was unfortunate to me that United management has managed to pretty much ignore a very good job by their employees, versus highlighting it as a postive to the public for their product.
AD
#63
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA 1K 25 years/2MM, Honors LT Diamond, AVIS & Hertz Prez Club
Posts: 4,753
I'd like to see the employees recognized publicly as well.
So far, I don't think names have been released to the public, other than the Co Pilot who spoke to AP since a reporter was on the plane. After the NTSB releases an initial report on 4/18, maybe then the company will do something for all to see.
But AD, I do, completely hear where you're coming from.
So far, I don't think names have been released to the public, other than the Co Pilot who spoke to AP since a reporter was on the plane. After the NTSB releases an initial report on 4/18, maybe then the company will do something for all to see.
But AD, I do, completely hear where you're coming from.
#64
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 286
"It's how you do the ordinary things you do every day, that will give you a chance for that one extraordinary day."
That this wasn't an astonishing thing and instead is something you'd expect out of any United pilot is not a reason to not glorify it. Quite the opposite, it's the reason you should be glorifying the pilot you have flying for you all the time. For my money, United has a consistently exceptional piloting crew. There is a level of pride in their profession and safety, and a view of it that while is there in spots anywhere, just is not the same caliber at many other airlines. That people think what United has is just the same as a job, is a reason we're in really good danger of losing it in the longer upcoming years. I've had several weird plane things happen on United and each time I've come away thinking, "That's why I want to fly with United pilots." And I've had some weird plane things happen other places, and while a couple were good, others I've come away thinking, "That's why I want to fly with United pilots."
And you still have to give major credit to the crew here. This was not just another good day at the office, albeit a bit trickier than usual. Take the long runway under construction needing clearing in the middle of all this? Quick pilot, make a bunch of new decisions and discussions, don't lose any of your other balls in the air, and these weren't in your practice book...
That this wasn't an astonishing thing and instead is something you'd expect out of any United pilot is not a reason to not glorify it. Quite the opposite, it's the reason you should be glorifying the pilot you have flying for you all the time. For my money, United has a consistently exceptional piloting crew. There is a level of pride in their profession and safety, and a view of it that while is there in spots anywhere, just is not the same caliber at many other airlines. That people think what United has is just the same as a job, is a reason we're in really good danger of losing it in the longer upcoming years. I've had several weird plane things happen on United and each time I've come away thinking, "That's why I want to fly with United pilots." And I've had some weird plane things happen other places, and while a couple were good, others I've come away thinking, "That's why I want to fly with United pilots."
And you still have to give major credit to the crew here. This was not just another good day at the office, albeit a bit trickier than usual. Take the long runway under construction needing clearing in the middle of all this? Quick pilot, make a bunch of new decisions and discussions, don't lose any of your other balls in the air, and these weren't in your practice book...
#65
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: UA 1K MM, Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA PLT
Posts: 1,082
Do you want a medal of honor? Sure it was a good job... after all, it is a pilot's JOB to fly the plane, even in reaction to emergencies.... Don't glorify it, it's a good job in the line of duty. If you want to glorify something, put the guys that are fighting IEDs and rogue terrorist cells in Afghanistan, or the rescue workers digging through teetering rubble while facing nuclear exposure and constant 7+ magnitude earthquakes in Japan.
Nobody compared the pilots of 497 to the heros you mentioned. The point was that they did a great piece of flying, given the fact their aircraft was failing them. Lesser trained pilots may not have done so well, and so the UA pilots DO deserve recognition as does the company for hiring and training them the way they did.
#66
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,605
Do you want a medal of honor? Sure it was a good job... after all, it is a pilot's JOB to fly the plane, even in reaction to emergencies.... Don't glorify it, it's a good job in the line of duty. If you want to glorify something, put the guys that are fighting IEDs and rogue terrorist cells in Afghanistan, or the rescue workers digging through teetering rubble while facing nuclear exposure and constant 7+ magnitude earthquakes in Japan.
Last edited by FriendlySkies; Apr 7, 2011 at 7:35 pm Reason: Typo
#68
In memoriam
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Danville, CA
Programs: AA EXP - UA *G MM - HH Diamond - Hertz PC
Posts: 3,242
Do you want a medal of honor? Sure it was a good job... after all, it is a pilot's JOB to fly the plane, even in reaction to emergencies.... Don't glorify it, it's a good job in the line of duty. If you want to glorify something, put the guys that are fighting IEDs and rogue terrorist cells in Afghanistan, or the rescue workers digging through teetering rubble while facing nuclear exposure and constant 7+ magnitude earthquakes in Japan.
It isn't about glorifying what the cockpit crew did, its being thankful the crew had the necessary experience to bring the aircraft down safely under extreme pressure. Even if it is just part of another day on the job for them.
#69
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PHX
Programs: AS MVP, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,259
ETA: the info I just mentioned is in the ntsb press release, not the prelim report.
Last edited by Ripper3785; Apr 10, 2011 at 5:28 pm
#70
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SMF
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP
Posts: 1,537
Lurker
#71
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
Do you want a medal of honor? Sure it was a good job... after all, it is a pilot's JOB to fly the plane, even in reaction to emergencies.... Don't glorify it, it's a good job in the line of duty. If you want to glorify something, put the guys that are fighting IEDs and rogue terrorist cells in Afghanistan, or the rescue workers digging through teetering rubble while facing nuclear exposure and constant 7+ magnitude earthquakes in Japan.
Just because it's someone's job doesn't mean they are doing it well. Have had lots of bad meals in restaurants, because the cooks didn't do a good job. Nobody wants to glorify anything, just recognize these two pilots for a job extremely well done. Could have easily gone the other way, but this time everybody on board got home safely. That's what it's all about^
#73
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MBS/FNT/LAN
Programs: UA 1K, HH Gold, Mariott Gold
Posts: 9,630
And here is the "real" report, on the preliminary report :
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...o&mod=yahoo_hs
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...o&mod=yahoo_hs
Pilots of a United Airlines jet apparently didn't follow proper procedures and inadvertently disabled some vital electrical systems after they received a fire warning and started an emergency return earlier this month to New Orleans, according to people familiar with the probe.
A team of safety experts led by the National Transportation Safety Board has tentatively concluded that after skipping over a portion of a checklist, the pilots of the Airbus A320 also failed to restore power to some equipment, making it more difficult to carry out the emergency landing, the people familiar with the matter said. No one was hurt in the April 4 incident.
A team of safety experts led by the National Transportation Safety Board has tentatively concluded that after skipping over a portion of a checklist, the pilots of the Airbus A320 also failed to restore power to some equipment, making it more difficult to carry out the emergency landing, the people familiar with the matter said. No one was hurt in the April 4 incident.
#74
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SJC, SFO
Programs: ex-elite, now just pay C/J myself to avoid the hassle of keeping status.
Posts: 377
So the loss of instrument was due to the failure to switch generator back on? Perhaps the crew was not entirely above reproach?
On the comment section from the WSJ article today, someone said the time the crew had to react was so short that their top priority was to land the aircraft, not worrying about nose gear steering or instrument power.
i would like to hear some of the expert (pilots) opinions on FT though.
On the comment section from the WSJ article today, someone said the time the crew had to react was so short that their top priority was to land the aircraft, not worrying about nose gear steering or instrument power.
i would like to hear some of the expert (pilots) opinions on FT though.
#75
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: UA 1K MM, Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA PLT
Posts: 1,082
Post evac video
Here's a YouTube Video taken by a passenger/off-duty reporter of the moments after the evac...kind of interesting.