The very good and the ugly - And nothing in the middle
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: Plenty
Posts: 227
The very good and the ugly - And nothing in the middle
Two recent experiences with United:
(1) TUS-LAX-SFO (Ugly)
TUS-LAX was on a UX RJ200. Enough said. Due to weather delays the flight arrived late in LAX, but timely enough to allow for most connections. Incredibly, the plane stopped 40 yards away from the gate (for those who know LAX - the last gate at the tip of the terminal, gate 80 something). After a couple of minutes UA ground control sent the plane on a remote parking position. Apparently UA ground control could not figure out the sequence of other planes leaving the gates and simply decided to hold flights and clear waiting planes out of the way.
At that time a 20 minute delay grew to 40 minutes. Most pax missed their connections and the typical mayhem ensued since UA had exactly one CSR in gate area. All I needed was to pick up a new BP. Given the long line I tried the RCC - and was rudely shown the door. Yes, I am not a RCC member (not worth the money IMHO) but as a 1K I had hoped the act of spending 30 seconds to print a new BP would fall under general customer service. It ultimately took 42 minutes in line to get the new BP - ehough to nearly miss the re-bokked flight.
The original LAX-SFO leg had been upgraded and before boarding I asked - very politely - about getting upgraded on the re-bokked flight. A fairly gumpy gate agent told me to get out of his hair. I boarded as one of the last 5 passengers and was told that no upgrades were available ("F is full"), a number of other pax were also denied upgrades. I was none to happy to discover that the F cabin was half empty. The GA's attitude very much seemed to be "you don't deserved to be in F so I will not upgrade you".
Summary: Less than stellar operational intelligence, understaffing, and staff unwilling to assist in event he smallest way or staff interpreting CS in "interesting" ways.
(2) BOS-SFO (very good)
Great F cabin crew. Attentive. Polite. The captain kept the pax updated (again wehather delay) and was even funny. The food was good. This was one of the rare occassions which led me to send a comepliment to WHQ.
Summary: All in all a very good experience.
What to make of this? I guess this is UA in a nutshell - some very good and quite a bit of very bad CS. But what is so difficult to create a consistent, half decent CS experience? Other airlines from SQ to VJ (Virgin Blue) get this done.
(1) TUS-LAX-SFO (Ugly)
TUS-LAX was on a UX RJ200. Enough said. Due to weather delays the flight arrived late in LAX, but timely enough to allow for most connections. Incredibly, the plane stopped 40 yards away from the gate (for those who know LAX - the last gate at the tip of the terminal, gate 80 something). After a couple of minutes UA ground control sent the plane on a remote parking position. Apparently UA ground control could not figure out the sequence of other planes leaving the gates and simply decided to hold flights and clear waiting planes out of the way.
At that time a 20 minute delay grew to 40 minutes. Most pax missed their connections and the typical mayhem ensued since UA had exactly one CSR in gate area. All I needed was to pick up a new BP. Given the long line I tried the RCC - and was rudely shown the door. Yes, I am not a RCC member (not worth the money IMHO) but as a 1K I had hoped the act of spending 30 seconds to print a new BP would fall under general customer service. It ultimately took 42 minutes in line to get the new BP - ehough to nearly miss the re-bokked flight.
The original LAX-SFO leg had been upgraded and before boarding I asked - very politely - about getting upgraded on the re-bokked flight. A fairly gumpy gate agent told me to get out of his hair. I boarded as one of the last 5 passengers and was told that no upgrades were available ("F is full"), a number of other pax were also denied upgrades. I was none to happy to discover that the F cabin was half empty. The GA's attitude very much seemed to be "you don't deserved to be in F so I will not upgrade you".
Summary: Less than stellar operational intelligence, understaffing, and staff unwilling to assist in event he smallest way or staff interpreting CS in "interesting" ways.
(2) BOS-SFO (very good)
Great F cabin crew. Attentive. Polite. The captain kept the pax updated (again wehather delay) and was even funny. The food was good. This was one of the rare occassions which led me to send a comepliment to WHQ.
Summary: All in all a very good experience.
What to make of this? I guess this is UA in a nutshell - some very good and quite a bit of very bad CS. But what is so difficult to create a consistent, half decent CS experience? Other airlines from SQ to VJ (Virgin Blue) get this done.
#2
Moderator, Hertz; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRK
Programs: UA 1MM, BA GGL, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond and others
Posts: 12,695
I would of tried upgrading at a easy checkin, or try another agent (if one was free) if possible
#4
#5
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Trenton NJ
Programs: UA Gold MM, Honors Diamond, Marriott Gold, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 3,670
If only reprinting, find an EasyChicken. You can always reprint if you can find one of the machines (though I can't remember where there might be any inside the terminal at LAX).
#6
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: BOS
Programs: JetBlue Mosaic, WN A List Preferred, Hyatt Globalest, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, IHG Spire
Posts: 3,966
After a flight goes under gate control typically at t minus 20 minutes (in UA jargon they call it "gating the flight" I think) then I don't think an Easy Chicken or even an agent at any terminal other than that at the departure gate can complete any ACI transactions. ACI = automatic check in or basically the system handling check in and dm lists. An upgrade at that point would be an ACI transaction.
I've also had good experiences on my BOS transcons they have a good crew working BOS typically, and I've always managed to get an upgrade on my BOS transcons knocking on wood.
I've also had good experiences on my BOS transcons they have a good crew working BOS typically, and I've always managed to get an upgrade on my BOS transcons knocking on wood.
#7
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Programs: UA 1.5 Million Mile flyer, Hilton Diamond, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz 5* and PC since 1985
Posts: 5,611
Sorry but you don't have a membership for the RCC so the agent was correct in sending you away. It is a benefit of being a member, one of the main reasons I belong.
Irregular ops , seating and a better bathroom (better than the one the "lice" have to use) are nice and worth the dues I pay.
Irregular ops , seating and a better bathroom (better than the one the "lice" have to use) are nice and worth the dues I pay.
#8
In Memoriam, Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,879
There are tons of Mr. Easy's about 50 feet from the RCC at LAX.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,133
Heck, I've never noticed the Mr. Easy's near the RCC! But if the flight was under gate agent control sounds like it doesn't matter if the EZs were there or not. And why do they have them near the RCC since normally you have to have checked in to get through TSA. Do that many people check in for other flights once they've already started traveling?
On a sep note - to the OP, sorry to be hard, but the RCC did the right thing in turning you away. You weren't a member. If they did your BP they'd have to do anyone else's that wandered in w/ irregular ops.
Glad the Boston flight went well. Cheers.
On a sep note - to the OP, sorry to be hard, but the RCC did the right thing in turning you away. You weren't a member. If they did your BP they'd have to do anyone else's that wandered in w/ irregular ops.
Glad the Boston flight went well. Cheers.
#10
Join Date: Apr 2002
Programs: AA, UA, NW
Posts: 120
My 2 cents!
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,133
Well that's nice that they did it for you, but again, it's a membership club, so they were correct in turning him away. Given the hassle he experienced I could see them cutting him some slack (and probably should have), but they were within their rights to say no. And if I were you I certainly wouldn't count on all the RCC staff being so understanding/helping you out.
I'm still more interested in why there are EZs near the RCC given it's airside. I can't imagine why they really need them.
Cheers.
I'm still more interested in why there are EZs near the RCC given it's airside. I can't imagine why they really need them.
Cheers.
#12
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SNA
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K (until it expires then never again), *wood Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,240
I also believe there are some Mr Chickens right at the beginning of T8 pier, so if your walking from T8->7 you would go right past 3 or 4. My guess as to why they have them airside is because they only have 1 CSR in LAX as a whole to handle irrops (or so it seems).
As to using the RCC, heck no!! The ONLY reason I pay for RCC (with miles) is to use the agents during irrops as there is typically no line, if every 1K could go "just to print a bp" the line would be just as long as the one in the terminal.
As to using the RCC, heck no!! The ONLY reason I pay for RCC (with miles) is to use the agents during irrops as there is typically no line, if every 1K could go "just to print a bp" the line would be just as long as the one in the terminal.
#13
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,490
FWIW We bought a walk-in membership with miles at ORD a few years ago when we were still 2P during a long delay. Despite my share of whining about the lack of food, etc., it's been well worth it for us to maintain membership for the concierge access in such instances as the OP describes.
#14
Join Date: May 2007
Location: changes frequently
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 56
All I got to say is that I'm glad I read this and now I'll know to call em "Mr. Easy".
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,572
Sorry but you don't have a membership for the RCC so the agent was correct in sending you away. It is a benefit of being a member, one of the main reasons I belong.
Irregular ops , seating and a better bathroom (better than the one the "lice" have to use) are nice and worth the dues I pay.
Irregular ops , seating and a better bathroom (better than the one the "lice" have to use) are nice and worth the dues I pay.
The problem here is that UA doesn't staff its hubs with enough CSRs to handle operations during regular ops. During irregular ops, UA goes into full meltdown. IME, this is an issue unique to UA, at least when compared to AS, AA and NW.