Pilot in F (per policy/contract) while paying elites are not
#46
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, UA Mileage Plus 1K, AA Executive Plat, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,344
example: ORD-LHR booked to 18/26..........however, C fare is not available, so I then have to book a different flight or book in coach.
#47
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: AAdvantage EXPLAT, Hilton Diamond, SPG/Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Citi Exec MC, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,443
Well, the pilots did pay. They are on business travel and their employer bought first class tickets for them. Their employer also happens to be the one that operates the flight.
#48
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Programs: United 1K,Marriott Platinum Premier,IHC Platinum Ambassador,Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,898
If an airline employee is traveling on company business they are not a non-rev..They get confirmed first class..What I often wonder is if someone is so concerned with sitting in FC..why wouldnt they just buy a FC ticket.
#49
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Denver
Posts: 451
Pilots deadheading are similar to any other person traveling on business, which is the category many here fall into. A lot of companies pay for business or first class seats for their employees to travel for business purposes, which is essentially what UA does for it's employees at times when traveling for business purposes. So I fail to see why some people have such a problem with it, because it seems perfectly logical and reasonable to me.
#50
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
Regardless of what either UA policy or labor contract says, I'd gladly give up an upgrade in favor of any non-flying cockpit crew. They work hard, often in far from comfortable seats, suffer jet lag that few us do, crossing the continent and between continents several times per week. I want them to get as much rest as possible, even when not traveling on company business. If loosing an upgrade helps them rest, by all means: economy is fine with me, especially compared to a tired aviator.
Last edited by Indelaware; Jul 15, 2014 at 3:32 pm
#51
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Regardless of what either UA policy or labor contract says, I'd gladly give up an upgrade in favor of any non-flying cockpit crew. They work hard, often in far from comfortable seats, suffer jet lag that few us doing, crossing the continent and between continents several times per week. I want them to get as much rest as possible, even when not traveling on company business. If loosing an upgrade helps them rest, by all means: economy is fine with me, especially compared to a tired aviator.
#52
Suspended
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Just outside Big D, or many other places in big metal tubes
Programs: WN Rpd.Rwrds, AA, was longtime CO very top Elite tier, Overentitled UA Lifetime 1K (since 2012)
Posts: 1,334
Regardless of what either UA policy or labor contract says, I'd gladly give up an upgrade in favor of any non-flying cockpit crew. They work hard, often in far from comfortable seats, suffer jet lag that few us doing, crossing the continent and between continents several times per week. I want them to get as much rest as possible, even when not traveling on company business. If loosing an upgrade helps them rest, by all means: economy is fine with me, especially compared to a tired aviator.
#53
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
I've done it. However, I have also made last minute switches with elderly, disabled individuals, and with people who appear to be hard-working pleasant individuals who, like me, would never pay for F, but unlike me do not fly but occasionally. It may be bending the rules, but can be done with the right smile and words to gate agent or cabin crew. People tend to say yes to favors which they do not view as benefiting the requester.
#54
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: DL PM, MR Titanium/LTP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,130
So while there may not have been an explicit cash transaction, the pilots lost something in return for having the benefit.
#55
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Palm Beach FL, USA
Programs: Delta Platinum Medallion, Hyatt GLobalist
Posts: 138
Wow...50% as a Gold. Enjoying those Saturday-night flights to Vegas?
Actually EWR-PBI off season, five straight CPUs in a row including the last two right at the 48 hour mark.
Actually EWR-PBI off season, five straight CPUs in a row including the last two right at the 48 hour mark.
#56
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: UA, Starwood, Priority Club, Hertz, Starbucks Gold Card
Posts: 3,952
Employee traveling on company business: NRPS
Non Rev Positive Space
Employee traveling on their own pleasure/commute/whatever: NRSA
Non Rev Space Available
Both groups are nonrevs. Let's not let "nonrev" become any more of a pejorative than it already is on FT (not the least of which the UA board). I, for one, try my best to respect the employees' flying privileges when I encounter them, just as much as I expect the employees to show respect to paying customers when going through the procedures both on the ground and in the air.
Non Rev Positive Space
Employee traveling on their own pleasure/commute/whatever: NRSA
Non Rev Space Available
Both groups are nonrevs. Let's not let "nonrev" become any more of a pejorative than it already is on FT (not the least of which the UA board). I, for one, try my best to respect the employees' flying privileges when I encounter them, just as much as I expect the employees to show respect to paying customers when going through the procedures both on the ground and in the air.
#57
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FL 290 through FL390
Posts: 1,687
Based on first-hand experience I feel more rested after riding in first class than I do after riding in coach, especially a long flight. I don't think anybody would dispute that fact. Also based on first-hand experience, when I was a regular commuter doing short commutes, I’d not worry too much whether I rode in coach or even the cockpit jumpseat going to work, but when I was commuting from west coast to east, I would invariably come out the night before and rest up in my crash pad before going to fly.
So, all other things being equal, I would say yes, when we’re flying, we're safer than someone riding in coach when commuting to work. Again, that’s indisputable. Of course, we all have the responsibility to make sure that were well rested for work no matter what seat we're riding in. It's just a lot easier when we ride in first class versus coach.
I have not deadheaded in anything other than coach in a very long time, probably since the advent of unlimited domestic upgrades. Most of my deadheads are either shorter than three hours, or I will not be flying after the deadhead, or "first class was not available at the time of booking", even when the deadhead was scheduled in excess of a month ahead of the actual deadhead segment.
FAB
#58
Moderator: Midwest, Las Vegas & Dining Buzz
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 17,976
Regardless of what either UA policy or labor contract says, I'd gladly give up an upgrade in favor of any non-flying cockpit crew. They work hard, often in far from comfortable seats, suffer jet lag that few us do, crossing the continent and between continents several times per week. I want them to get as much rest as possible, even when not traveling on company business. If loosing an upgrade helps them rest, by all means: economy is fine with me, especially compared to a tired aviator.
Hey, guess what. I work hard, suffer jet lag, crossing the continent and between continents several times a week. I want to get as much rest as possible, even when not flying on my company's business.
I think I deserve the F seat.
#59
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FL 290 through FL390
Posts: 1,687
FAB
#60
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 8,634