Weight and Balance issue - seat moved for takeoff
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 3,236
Weight and Balance issue - seat moved for takeoff
Flying an ERJ145 yesterday EWR-MCI.
When I can't get row 12, I take 2A if available, since it's not as cold as 1A and (when the FA isn't in the galley) you pop the arm rests and sit diagonally stretching your legs into the galley. Probably the most legroom outside of row 12. Very helpful on a 3+ hour RJ flight.
On this flight, the FA told me and pax in 1A that because of Weight and Balance issues, we would have to move behind row 16 for takeoff. I've seen this on empty flights before, but this one only had 5 open seats (4 windows and the dreaded 19B).
What actually determines when this is necessary? I'm assuming that the request isn't optional (I can't say, "no thanks" and expect them to go to the next passenger). Hard to believe that the relocated 300-350 lbs for 2 people on a nearly full flight made that much of a difference.
It wasn't too bad, since the FA let us come back up as soon as we passed 10K feet, but I could see an FA insisting you wait for the seat belt sign to go off, which on this flight was at least an hour into the flight.
When I can't get row 12, I take 2A if available, since it's not as cold as 1A and (when the FA isn't in the galley) you pop the arm rests and sit diagonally stretching your legs into the galley. Probably the most legroom outside of row 12. Very helpful on a 3+ hour RJ flight.
On this flight, the FA told me and pax in 1A that because of Weight and Balance issues, we would have to move behind row 16 for takeoff. I've seen this on empty flights before, but this one only had 5 open seats (4 windows and the dreaded 19B).
What actually determines when this is necessary? I'm assuming that the request isn't optional (I can't say, "no thanks" and expect them to go to the next passenger). Hard to believe that the relocated 300-350 lbs for 2 people on a nearly full flight made that much of a difference.
It wasn't too bad, since the FA let us come back up as soon as we passed 10K feet, but I could see an FA insisting you wait for the seat belt sign to go off, which on this flight was at least an hour into the flight.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Usually they want N pax from Rows A-B to move behind Row C.
They don't usually single out a person or two.
Usually this happens when they're light on bags and need the weight in the rear for balance. If they're completely full and still need the weight in back, they'll load extra weight in the back (ballast) to make the numbers work.
They don't usually single out a person or two.
Usually this happens when they're light on bags and need the weight in the rear for balance. If they're completely full and still need the weight in back, they'll load extra weight in the back (ballast) to make the numbers work.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 10,159
I am not certain of the exact zones for the 145, but it seems 1A and 2A are always prime candidates for re-seating due to weight and balance...probably since they are so far forward.
I agree they are decent seats if 12A is not available, but I have stopped selecting them due to the potential move issue.
But then again, if 12A is not available, I will not usually pick that flight. I have done 12B a couple times as an exception for flight times that I greatly preferred, but anything else is a no-go for me.
I agree they are decent seats if 12A is not available, but I have stopped selecting them due to the potential move issue.
But then again, if 12A is not available, I will not usually pick that flight. I have done 12B a couple times as an exception for flight times that I greatly preferred, but anything else is a no-go for me.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
I'm not confident that 1A and 2A are a zone, or if the FA likes having them empty because they're close to the galley.
#7
Moderator: Hawaii-based airlines & Hawai'i forums
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ka ʻĀpala Nui, Nuioka
Programs: NEXUS/Global Entry, Delta, United, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott, and Hertz
Posts: 18,039
I started avoiding anything in front of Row 3 at the ERJ-145s due to the weight and balance thing; I see this more than on CRJ-200 for some reason.
I try and stick with Row 12 for these flights.
I try and stick with Row 12 for these flights.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 164
My colleagues tell me that UAX ExpressJet has a new computerized weight and balance system that's exactingly precise and is requiring them to move people for weight and balance a lot more than they used to do.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
+1 - Close to inconceiveable that this would be an issue once aircraft is at or close to level flying.
The FA has zippo to do with this. It's the Captain and dispatcher working from other w&b inputs such as bags, freight, fuel.
Smaller the aircraft, the more common this is.
The FA has zippo to do with this. It's the Captain and dispatcher working from other w&b inputs such as bags, freight, fuel.
Smaller the aircraft, the more common this is.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,605
While I've never had this happen on the ERJ-145, it does happen quite often on the Q400. Had an FA ask me to move to the last five rows for the entire flight.. At least I slept the entire flight, or else I would have been mad that I lost all of the legroom that I originally had in the exit row.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
The larger airplanes have the baggage in compartments under the floor so they can control how much of the bag weight is in the front and the back. The smaller airplanes have a single baggage area so the only way to adjust the balance is to move passengers.
#15
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 217
On the ExpressJet 145's, zone 1 is rows 1 and 2. Zone 2 is rows 3-6. Zone 3 is rows 7-10. Zone 4 is rows 11-15 and zone 5 is rows 16-19. The computer simply returns a message telling the crew how many passengers to move and from which zone to which zone. And yes, it is exactingly precise since its computerized.