North Korean Missile test UA835
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Programs: UA, AA, DL
Posts: 44
North Korean Missile test UA835
The "normal" flight path for UA835 usually goes from Chicago to China via an east to west route. Is today's UA 835 going west to east instead of east to west because of the threat of a North Korean missile test? Or is there another explanation?
#4
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
If I click on your FlightAware link and then I click on an earlier flight, as far back as 27 Nov, I see that all such flights make a huge detour around North Korea. Based on that observation, it seems like this might be the typical flight path, no?
#5
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: LHR
Programs: Accor PLT,Thai Silver, HH Dia, SPG Titanium (LT Gold), Aegean Gold, BA Silver
Posts: 5,120
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
The flight plan does seem to be skewed in that region but it's hard to decipher if that's a FlightAware issue or otherwise.
#8
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
That's not true at all - quite the opposite in fact, all the ones I checked go right through the middle of North Korea. Using 27 Nov as an example:
The flight plan does seem to be skewed in that region but it's hard to decipher if that's a FlightAware issue or otherwise.
The flight plan does seem to be skewed in that region but it's hard to decipher if that's a FlightAware issue or otherwise.
If you look at Dec 3, the results are even more strange. On Dec 3, I see the green line mapping the blue line all the way through the northern area of Chinese airspace, and then, the green line simply stops.
I'm not sure how to interpret this data. But, the blue line shows consistent avoidance of DPRK airspace, and this holds true across dates. The behavior of the green line across dates is less consistent.
Is it possible that FlightAware might not have the ability to actually track the jet through that region?
#9
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: MRY
Programs: UA Platinum 2MM(BIS)
Posts: 181
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Programs: UA, AA, DL
Posts: 44
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
Or it could be the wind favorable route today.
You'd have to check the track log to see if there's actually any positions over North Korea. It could just be connecting a straight line between known positions in the US and China.
That's not true at all - quite the opposite in fact, all the ones I checked go right through the middle of North Korea. Using 27 Nov as an example:
The flight plan does seem to be skewed in that region but it's hard to decipher if that's a FlightAware issue or otherwise.
The flight plan does seem to be skewed in that region but it's hard to decipher if that's a FlightAware issue or otherwise.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 323
Indeed, even in the small pic posted here, the line looks too straight to be the actual flightpath. The bigger map on flightaware is even clearer about that. We've all seen the moving map onboard--do the route lines EVER look that perfect? I think it's far more probable that they flew something closer to the filed plan (the dotted blue line), or something completely different to avoid overflying the DPRK
#14
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
a bit unfounded considering the difficulty of surface to air missiles had of successfully hit a target until heat seeking technology was developed. 3-dimensional airspace is big and very hard for a collision to occur (those tend to occur in controlled air corridors in congested areas -- near airports)
#15
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: IAD,MOW
Programs: PMUA
Posts: 247
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siber...es_Flight_1812
Pretty sure N.Koreans use same old technology as Ukraine
Pretty sure N.Koreans use same old technology as Ukraine