NRT-LAX Business advice
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16
NRT-LAX Business advice
I am looking for advice on a Business class trip from NRT-LAX.
Options are:
UA890 on a pmUA 777-200 or
UA9686on a All Nippon Airways 777-300ER
The price and schedule are the not a factor, I am just looking for opinions on which has the better in flight experience
Thanks in advance.
Options are:
UA890 on a pmUA 777-200 or
UA9686on a All Nippon Airways 777-300ER
The price and schedule are the not a factor, I am just looking for opinions on which has the better in flight experience
Thanks in advance.
#4
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 130
I am looking for advice on a Business class trip from NRT-LAX.
Options are:
UA890 on a pmUA 777-200 or
UA9686on a All Nippon Airways 777-300ER
The price and schedule are the not a factor, I am just looking for opinions on which has the better in flight experience
Thanks in advance.
Options are:
UA890 on a pmUA 777-200 or
UA9686on a All Nippon Airways 777-300ER
The price and schedule are the not a factor, I am just looking for opinions on which has the better in flight experience
Thanks in advance.
#8
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,220
those that say the CO or UA C seat is "Great" must not have flown many other airlines in C. The NH seat is 100X better. Every seat has aisle access & room to stretch out when its a bed, the CO seat is fine for shorter hops to Europe but that little cubby hole for your feet ruin the seat. NH food, service & IFE is miles better then the sCO flights (& the sUA flights as well)
UA C seats are great when your not paying for them & upgraded but if paying for C or F, you don't fly UA. Especially when NH gives you the same mileage credit
UA C seats are great when your not paying for them & upgraded but if paying for C or F, you don't fly UA. Especially when NH gives you the same mileage credit
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,752
I am looking for advice on a Business class trip from NRT-LAX.
Options are:
UA890 on a pmUA 777-200 or
UA9686on a All Nippon Airways 777-300ER
The price and schedule are the not a factor, I am just looking for opinions on which has the better in flight experience
Thanks in advance.
Options are:
UA890 on a pmUA 777-200 or
UA9686on a All Nippon Airways 777-300ER
The price and schedule are the not a factor, I am just looking for opinions on which has the better in flight experience
Thanks in advance.
#12
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, UA Nobody, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,372
NH in an instant: food, seat and service are all significantly better than UA even with the UA lie flats. Plus you'll have a gamble with UA on whether you get an old crappy recliner instead of a lie flat.
Don't know what NH facilities are like at LAX, but you'll have better service at NRT with NH.
PS Avoid the Tomato Parfait (seriously!) for desert on NH. As the saying goes, knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad!
Don't know what NH facilities are like at LAX, but you'll have better service at NRT with NH.
PS Avoid the Tomato Parfait (seriously!) for desert on NH. As the saying goes, knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad!
#15
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Premier Gold, AA Platinum (but I also just pay for upgrades if I want them)
Posts: 636
Go NH all the way. I took my first flight on this route on UA...eh...the last three I have taken on NH and its so nice. its a 1-2-1 config in business class with a lot of privacy for every passenger and great service. easy to sleep on the lie flat bed
ua is 2-4-2 which is terrible for a biz class product.
now once they offer the 787 on this route I might change my mind
ua is 2-4-2 which is terrible for a biz class product.
now once they offer the 787 on this route I might change my mind