Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA130 (IAD-LHR) 15 July Diverts to YYT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:36 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Plat, 1MM
Posts: 2,182
Here's the report from Transport Canada that is cited in the other thread:
UAL130, Boeing 757-200 was enroute from Washington (KIAD) to London (EGLL), routing 49N040W at 03:04Z, at 39,000 ft., NAT Track V. At 03:24Z, the flight declared an emergency (engine out) and descended to 28,000 ft. The flight received clearance to St. John’s (CYYT) and landed safely at 05:15Z.

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Jul 17, 2012 at 6:14 pm
FortFun is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:38 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATL
Posts: 516
Here's the avherald report on it:

http://avherald.com/h?article=452c4069&opt=0

They "dropped" from 39k feet to 28k feet due to being on only one engine.
vkng is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:39 am
  #18  
Formerly known as hcampana
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AMS
Programs: Hilton Diamond
Posts: 463
Originally Posted by SFO777
Just 50 pax? In July?
probably because flights are so expensive this year

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14 am Reason: language
myeurocrush is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:41 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,393
Originally Posted by SFO777
"...The Boeing 757-200 carrying 50 passengers and 9 crew members landed safely and without incident..."

Just 50 pax? In July?
50 pax? Smisek could have flown this trip with an RJ!
hobo13 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:41 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 259
OMG - I would have been terrified
iexaltu is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:47 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: UA 2.5MM; HH Diamond; Hyatt Platinum; MR Gold
Posts: 1,355
Originally Posted by hcampana
probably because flights are so expensive this year
And because those of us who are paying the horrible fares are making sure we're not stuck on a narrow-body on the route.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14 am Reason: quote
gvdIAD is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:52 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATL
Posts: 516
Originally Posted by iexaltu
OMG - I would have been terrified
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but in case you're not, they didn't drop 20k. They drifted down 11k feet. There's a huge difference.
vkng is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 10:58 am
  #23  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
Originally Posted by hobo13
Originally Posted by SFO777
"...The Boeing 757-200 carrying 50 passengers and 9 crew members landed safely and without incident..."

Just 50 pax? In July?
50 pax? Smisek could have flown this trip with an RJ!
He did
uastarflyer is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 11:07 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,578
The article is pretty unclear about how they descended. The comments in article make it sound like it was rough..."like a ferry" they said I believe.
antonius66 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 11:15 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Programs: UA1k 3mm, HH-LifeDiamond, Mar-LifePlatElite
Posts: 351
It does seem the media is over-dramatiznig the situation. I'll be the first to admit, I fell (no pun intended) on the dropping 20k ft headline.

Thanks for the posters who list the flight as controlled decent, not a "drop", and glad everyone was OK!
UAgeek71 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 11:15 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Plat, 1MM
Posts: 2,182
Originally Posted by antonius66
The article is pretty unclear about how they descended. The comments in article make it sound like it was rough..."like a ferry" they said I believe.
True. But the Transport Canada report sounds an awful lot like a controlled descent of 11,000 miles. I'm sure it was faster than normal (pretty sure that's SOP), but doesn't sound like something that was ever out of control.
FortFun is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 11:19 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Gold/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott Plat
Posts: 963
My friend was on this flight. He posted a Facebook status:

"One of my worst fears came true tonight- engine failure over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I've got to say, it sure made for an interesting night. Now it's me, the luggage and the dirty airport floor... Im repeating to myself "I love my job, I love my job!)"

Scary and glad I wasn't on it...but glad everyone was okay.
AndrewT84 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 11:32 am
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,422
It does sound over-dramatized, but I guess we'll have to learn more from the passengers.

I've never had to turn back across the Atlantic, but I've gotten close a couple of times. The worst is when the pilot DOES alert you that you "might" have to turn back, and he'll "get back to you on it." Maybe I'm too blase about it, but I'm always thinking in terms of inconvenience (diversion to Canada or Shannon) and not that my plane might wind up IN the Pond.
iahphx is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 6:10 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: RDU
Programs: UA Plat 2MM, Delta Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott cardboard
Posts: 1,699
What? They didn't divert to PVG and let 'em sit for three days there?
dulcamara is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2012, 6:16 pm
  #30  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,136
"On-screen maps" and "aisles" (plural) on a 752?
exerda is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.