Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why no/few EMB120s at or ex-DEN?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2012, 9:28 pm
  #1  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,027
Why no/few EMB120s at or ex-DEN?

Transiting DIA, I noticed an EMB120 on the tarmac by the UAX gates.

I'm not sure I've seen one there before. Lots of CR7s, CR200s (miserable, execrable airplane), DASHs and Beechcrafts. But can't recall an EMB120 route (or maybe I've just not flown the right ex-Den segments).

Their lack of visibility at DIA contrasts with their ubiquity on the west coast.
cblaisd is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 10:17 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back in the saddle in AMWAJ
Programs: EK PLAT 2022-2023, UAplat soon to be LH senator!
Posts: 367
on a good day the 120s can not take a full load, attitude has alot to do with it.back in the early 90s i used to commute from grand junction and skywest flew them and i collected my fair share of DBC out of grand junction in the summer and winter due to weight restrictions...iirc it was usually 20-24 passengers to denver max and united would book the flights to 31-33
cosflyer is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2012, 7:44 am
  #3  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,027
That makes sense. Density altitude can really wreak havoc. I have flown an EMB120 RNO-SFO and it was a bit of a slow climb over the Sierras.
cblaisd is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2012, 9:54 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chicago
Programs: AA EP, UA Gold-MM, UA 1K (former), GS (former),SPG LT Platinum, Hyatt Diamond, HH Diamond
Posts: 2,299
Also perception plays a role ... post American Eagle ATR crash in Roselawn, IN both UA and AA committed to all jet RJ service at ORD due to icing fears that were significantly based on fear and not facts.

DEN being a cold weather station could also play a role in not seeing many EMB120's (although ORD never had any planes that small that I can remember). So it could just be a capacity issue.
neo_781 is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2012, 10:05 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LAS - I'm All In!
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott PP
Posts: 3,639
Originally Posted by cosflyer
on a good day the 120s can not take a full load, attitude has alot to do with it.back in the early 90s i used to commute from grand junction and skywest flew them and i collected my fair share of DBC out of grand junction in the summer and winter due to weight restrictions...iirc it was usually 20-24 passengers to denver max and united would book the flights to 31-33
I don't think the issue would be at Denver, but at the smaller airport returing to Denver (like GJT in your case). While Denver can be hot, it is only at 5K feet and I'm pretty sure it has runways more than long enough to handle a fully loaded EMB120.
trekwars2000 is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2012, 10:14 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern California
Programs: I want to be free! Free!
Posts: 3,455
Originally Posted by trekwars2000
I don't think the issue would be at Denver, but at the smaller airport returing to Denver (like GJT in your case). While Denver can be hot, it is only at 5K feet and I'm pretty sure it has runways more than long enough to handle a fully loaded EMB120.
Where do you have in mind? GJT's 11/29 is more than 10,000' and is about the same altitude as DEN.

I'd cite performance as well but great lakes has the B1900s; my guess would be the mix of stage lengths/high-hot performance/loads makes it more economical to run the EMBs out on the West Coast and CRJs out of DEN.
aCavalierInCoach is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2012, 10:22 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LAS - I'm All In!
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott PP
Posts: 3,639
Originally Posted by aCavalierInCoach
Where do you have in mind? GJT's 11/29 is more than 10,000' and is about the same altitude as DEN.

I'd cite performance as well but great lakes has the B1900s; my guess would be the mix of stage lengths/high-hot performance/loads makes it more economical to run the EMBs out on the West Coast and CRJs out of DEN.
Laramie is at 7500 feet and only has a 8500 ft runway. EGE is at 6500 and only has a 9000 foot runway. Gunnison is 7500 feet and only as a 9500 foot runway.

Denver is at 5000 feet and has a 16000 foot runway. Of course back in the day Denver didn't have that 16000 foot runway, only the 5 12000 foot runways.
trekwars2000 is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2012, 10:30 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: Whatever gets me there faster.
Posts: 746
COSFlyer is right. In the Summer, density altitude plays huge part in aircraft performance, and effects every airplane transiting through DEN. The E120 gets hurt more than others, though, not because it's smaller, but because it just can't get the power to climb in the hot, thin air due to a) the engine is limited in its power output due to the heat, and b) the props can't bite into the thinner air as well as it could the rest of the year. So, suffice to say, outside of Summer, it's performs excellently at DEN.

As for GJT, it does see restrictions in the summer, but not as bad as DEN would see.

Generally, the E120 is not a good mountain bird. It was made in Brazil, and well, there are no mountains (relatively) in Brazil.
DXjr is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2012, 11:08 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS 75K, BW Plat, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 10,724
While we do get our share of EMB120s out here on the West coast (especially LAX/SFO/PDX), I have yet to see an EMB-170 make an appearance at any West coast city....furthermore, as a frequent flyer, it's the only UA (actually UAX) plane I've never flown on...is DEN about as far west as they're willing to send them???
PDXPremier is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.