Hotel 'fines' couple £100 for bad review
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GLA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 2,962
Hotel 'fines' couple £100 for bad review
I've never heard of this before - it's appalling!
Clearly the hotel is a cheap dump in the first place, but even still...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30100973
Clearly the hotel is a cheap dump in the first place, but even still...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30100973
#2
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: United Plat and falling
Posts: 100
What an interesting case. I'm reminded of Monday's article in Slate on EULAs. I guess the hotel T&Cs are shorter than iTunes' 30 page agreement, but I would bet most people don't read them or just scan them - glasses or no.
#5
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 4,867
while i dont condone the practice, with that kind of review distribution on the hotel, why did these people stay here in the first place?
i get that many on the page are 1st-time reviewers and went on to rant, but there were "senior reviewers" amongst them. did they not bother to check before booking?
caveat emptor
i get that many on the page are 1st-time reviewers and went on to rant, but there were "senior reviewers" amongst them. did they not bother to check before booking?
caveat emptor
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,008
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/mid-a...ng-guests.html
It generally isn't very effective
This Hotel's $500 Fine For Bad Reviews Is Backfiring Horribly
The policy has already been changed, I suspect that the couple will get their money back, and anyone looking to stay here in the future will likely see this story on top of any search.
Just a dumb business move. But they don't sound like the best-run business operation to start with.
It generally isn't very effective
This Hotel's $500 Fine For Bad Reviews Is Backfiring Horribly
The policy has already been changed, I suspect that the couple will get their money back, and anyone looking to stay here in the future will likely see this story on top of any search.
Just a dumb business move. But they don't sound like the best-run business operation to start with.
#11
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GEG
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Lifetime SkyClub, AS MVP
Posts: 2,410
The intertubes are reporting that the money has been refunded to the couple and the "hotel" (I use that term loosely) has changed their policy.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
The only time we've ever been "fined" by a hotel because of a bad Tripadvisor review was in May 2010 after our honeymoon stay at Azura Benguerra Island in Mozambique.
We had negotiated a discounted rate due to low occupancy, and yet had so many problems (non-working air con, non-working lighting, non-existent wifi, horrible food, service issues galore, horribly improper wine storage, etc.) that the property agreed in writing before our departure to refund us a night off our stay.
After our return home, I wrote the candid Tripadvisor review...and then the property refused to process our refund because of the poor review. I contacted our travel agency, provided them with the written refund agreement, and told them that either the travel agency or Azura would have to refund our money within 48 hours or I would seek legal recourse and also post a second review with a copy of the written refund agreement and indicating that Azura was withholding our refund because of a bad review. Our refund was processed within a few hours.
Tripadvisor is both a powerful tool to help people choose properties and restaurants and a tool to force such vendors to abide by proper and legal practice. Only poor management and/or poor ownership are dumb enough to try and penalize someone for bad reviews instead of trying to improve quality. Obviously, there are fake reviews out there--but you rarely hear about a vendor penalizing people for those. It's always the genuine but bad reviews that vendors foolishly try to penalize, always to their own detriment in the end. KARMA. I've had tons of private messages from people who considered but didn't visit Azura because of our experience.
We had negotiated a discounted rate due to low occupancy, and yet had so many problems (non-working air con, non-working lighting, non-existent wifi, horrible food, service issues galore, horribly improper wine storage, etc.) that the property agreed in writing before our departure to refund us a night off our stay.
After our return home, I wrote the candid Tripadvisor review...and then the property refused to process our refund because of the poor review. I contacted our travel agency, provided them with the written refund agreement, and told them that either the travel agency or Azura would have to refund our money within 48 hours or I would seek legal recourse and also post a second review with a copy of the written refund agreement and indicating that Azura was withholding our refund because of a bad review. Our refund was processed within a few hours.
Tripadvisor is both a powerful tool to help people choose properties and restaurants and a tool to force such vendors to abide by proper and legal practice. Only poor management and/or poor ownership are dumb enough to try and penalize someone for bad reviews instead of trying to improve quality. Obviously, there are fake reviews out there--but you rarely hear about a vendor penalizing people for those. It's always the genuine but bad reviews that vendors foolishly try to penalize, always to their own detriment in the end. KARMA. I've had tons of private messages from people who considered but didn't visit Azura because of our experience.
#13
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CPH
Programs: EuroBonus
Posts: 431
while i dont condone the practice, with that kind of review distribution on the hotel, why did these people stay here in the first place?
i get that many on the page are 1st-time reviewers and went on to rant, but there were "senior reviewers" amongst them. did they not bother to check before booking?
caveat emptor
i get that many on the page are 1st-time reviewers and went on to rant, but there were "senior reviewers" amongst them. did they not bother to check before booking?
caveat emptor
DanishFlyer
#14
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: DL PM, 1MM, DL SC, Kimpton Inner Circle
Posts: 2,416
...After our return home, I wrote the candid Tripadvisor review...and then the property refused to process our refund because of the poor review. I contacted our travel agency, provided them with the written refund agreement, and told them that either the travel agency or Azura would have to refund our money within 48 hours or I would seek legal recourse and also post a second review with a copy of the written refund agreement and indicating that Azura was withholding our refund because of a bad review. Our refund was processed within a few hours.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
Indeed. They were supposed to have processed our refund before we arrived home; we hadn't realized they hadn't (shocking, right?) until after I posted the review. Then the drama ensued. I was tempted to still post a follow-up review to share what happened, and their recalcitrance, but I didn't want to seem too spiteful. :-)