Lightest carry-on bag
#526
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 77
Rather than paying big money for a lightweight duffel, there is always the alternative to simply buy material and a good zipper and have one made.
People to sew can usually be found on fabric store bulletin boards and asking around. It would probably be a very simple project for them.
People to sew can usually be found on fabric store bulletin boards and asking around. It would probably be a very simple project for them.
#528
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,344
#529
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TLV
Programs: UA Platinum, Avis Chairman, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, GA Pilot
Posts: 3,225
#530
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,643
#531
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,043
#532
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1
.28 Pounds
I had to chuckle reading back to 2008 and people still recommending 4 pound bags as lightweight ways to carry things.
I think the lightest way to get items reliably from Point A to Point B will be in cuben fiber. Now, it's pricey stuff and there aren't a lot of 30-45L options.
The absolute lightest I have seen is the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Stuff Sack at .28 pounds (basically a 30L cuben stuff sack with backpack straps). But that's kind of translucent, so I think better to go up to at least the black Metro (.42 pounds) or black Summit (.89 pounds). Both come in at 30L, although the Summit can have some external storage as well with the outer lash straps and/or optional pocket.
As far as larger than 30L volumes, there are two duffle/backpack options that I am aware of: D3 Duffel at 40L and Outlier Duffelpack at 15-50L. Both pretty interesting bags, both eye watering expensive. The CiloGear Worksacks have backpack versions in the 30-45 range (but you will look you are going on a space shuttle mission!) and get down to 1 pound if you strip all the extras off. The D3 duffle is a touch over 1 pound, the Outlier duffle a touch over 2.
If these cuben packs aren't your thing, then there are a lot of more traditional nylon duffels around the 1 pound mark that would do the trick (Victorinox Werks 5.0 is one that I have used and is quite good, with the expandability being a standout feature).
I have personally gravitated to a two bag system, where I have a small 20L backpack and a small 20L duffel and that works really well for me, as neither bag is very heavy and then at my destination, I have a great daybag pack, rather than a compromised version.
I think the lightest way to get items reliably from Point A to Point B will be in cuben fiber. Now, it's pricey stuff and there aren't a lot of 30-45L options.
The absolute lightest I have seen is the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Stuff Sack at .28 pounds (basically a 30L cuben stuff sack with backpack straps). But that's kind of translucent, so I think better to go up to at least the black Metro (.42 pounds) or black Summit (.89 pounds). Both come in at 30L, although the Summit can have some external storage as well with the outer lash straps and/or optional pocket.
As far as larger than 30L volumes, there are two duffle/backpack options that I am aware of: D3 Duffel at 40L and Outlier Duffelpack at 15-50L. Both pretty interesting bags, both eye watering expensive. The CiloGear Worksacks have backpack versions in the 30-45 range (but you will look you are going on a space shuttle mission!) and get down to 1 pound if you strip all the extras off. The D3 duffle is a touch over 1 pound, the Outlier duffle a touch over 2.
If these cuben packs aren't your thing, then there are a lot of more traditional nylon duffels around the 1 pound mark that would do the trick (Victorinox Werks 5.0 is one that I have used and is quite good, with the expandability being a standout feature).
I have personally gravitated to a two bag system, where I have a small 20L backpack and a small 20L duffel and that works really well for me, as neither bag is very heavy and then at my destination, I have a great daybag pack, rather than a compromised version.
#533
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AKL
Posts: 59
I think the only drawback with those soft bags is packing clothes neatly without having them thrown around. You would need to introduce something like packing cubes/garment folders to keep your clothes tidy.
Thats one reason those 4 pound bags were preferred.
I carry a slimline messenger bag, similar to your backpack arrangement and looking at getting a lightweight duffel that also wont mess up my clean folded clothes (probably will use the packing cube approach)
Thats one reason those 4 pound bags were preferred.
I carry a slimline messenger bag, similar to your backpack arrangement and looking at getting a lightweight duffel that also wont mess up my clean folded clothes (probably will use the packing cube approach)
#534
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PDX (wish I was in HNL)
Programs: Platinum
Posts: 1,687
I don't remember cuben fiber or dyneema available 10 years ago when I got my Redoxx Skytrain. I would consider those new fibers if my Skytrain wasn't so tough and continues to go.
I purchased a ultralight dynema backpack last year and agreed they are amazingly lightweight.
I purchased a ultralight dynema backpack last year and agreed they are amazingly lightweight.
#535
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PDX (wish I was in HNL)
Programs: Platinum
Posts: 1,687
Speaking of Cuban fiber backpacks, here's one from Z-Packs http://www.zpacks.com/backpacks/nero.shtml
It's 38L, 10.9 oz. Only $199
I have their Arc Blast backpack, great quality and very light weight
It's 38L, 10.9 oz. Only $199
I have their Arc Blast backpack, great quality and very light weight
#536
Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 6
Some luggage shown here are very expensive when purchasing directly from the vendor. I bought something in about $100 using some extensive research like shown on those cheap Delsey luggage deals
Sometimes newer models are cheaper than old ones so it's important to always check the new stuff and to enjoy travelling
Sometimes newer models are cheaper than old ones so it's important to always check the new stuff and to enjoy travelling
#537
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a hotel somewhere trying to repack everything I brought (and bought) in to a carry-on smaller than my last one.
Programs: UA, Asia Miles, Southwest, IHG
Posts: 1,101
What I love about it:
+ It folds flat so it can be a tag-a-long bag in a larger bag
+ It is single compartment so I can fit larger bulkier items such as toys and x'mas presents.
+ That single compartment expands, twice.
+ It's lightweight
+ It's goes on deep sale every few years and is a steal for all the reasons above.
What I detest about it:
- The velcro handles snag my clothes yet are not effective at keeping the handles closed during handling if checked. I always tie the handles together with a ribbon.
- If checking, make sure the tag goes between the sewn-in loops on the handle itself as the plastic snaps do come undone and the tag can slip off during handling. You have to be proactive and insistent on this as most check-in agents will ignore you unless you say that the handle is defective. While the plastic clips are perfectly strong enough for hand carry, they can pop open when yanked on by baggage handlers.
The only reason it is not my go-to bag anymore is that I prefer to have the weight on both shoulders or not at all and use the Eagle Creek Convertible Weekender or wheels (IT 20" rolling trolley)
#538
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 10
55 x 35 x 20 cm (21.5 x 13.5 x 7.5 inches)
plus 1 small bag up to 35 x 20 x 20 cms
Is the 7.5" thickness limitation the problem? The height and width limits seem reasonable.
You may need to look for a "onebag" with exterior compression straps, or use thin packing cubes or a compressible packing board (from Eagle Creek) plus interior tie-down straps to keep the thickness under 7.5".
In the USA I would go with the Rick Steves Original Backdoor Bag.
Usually if there are luggage testing boxes, you can squeeze a softsided bag inside if you don't overstuff it, but if your contents shift and the onebag looks lumpy you may have more scrutiny than if you use interior cubes or packing board and exterior straps to tighten things down.
#539
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 10
With the tight carry-on bag rules on most European airlines (LH: 8 kg and 55x40x20 cm, SAS: 8 kg and 23x40x55 cm, UK one bag rule etc.) packing light isn't simply enough, but you also need to find a very light carry-on bag. What is the lightest (yet sturdy) carry-on bag you've bought and used?
https://store.ricksteves.com/shop/p/classic-backpack
Outdoor Products Essentials Carryon
(might be discontinued but tends to go out of stock then come back)
https://www.gearbuyer.com/products/o..._carry_on.html
Or the Campmor website:
https://www.campmor.com/ProductUnpub...productId=null
I think the 20cm thickness limit is tough to meet since most travelers overstuff their bags, and even when not overstuffed, contents shift and make the bag lumpy towards the bottom. The only solution I can think of is to stabilized contents with a combination of packing cubes (and internal tie-downs) and packing boards (Eagle Creek), but these of course add weight.
The slightly heavier eBags Weekender onebag has three great features in this regard: (i) external compression straps; (ii) snap-in, optional divider panel to keep contents from shifting from top to bottom (in vertical carry mode); and (iii) interior tie-down straps that compress down instead of both down and inwards - they anchor from the mid-side panel not the bag's bottom. Look at the eBags photos and video demonstration, much easier to see it than read about it. Note how "fat" the eBags onebag can become, in the pictures, if you aren't disciplined in packing.
https://www.campmor.com/ProductUnpub...productId=null
Last edited by MicWebb; Sep 6, 2017 at 10:39 am Reason: more detail in last para and url
#540
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1
900g yet super durable!
With the tight carry-on bag rules on most European airlines (LH: 8 kg and 55x40x20 cm, SAS: 8 kg and 23x40x55 cm, UK one bag rule etc.) packing light isn't simply enough, but you also need to find a very light carry-on bag. What is the lightest (yet sturdy) carry-on bag you've bought and used?