Fox News: Could airlines soon be required to let families fly together?
#1
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Fox News: Could airlines soon be required to let families fly together?
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D - N.Y.) wants to add a special amendment to the FAA funding bill that is slated for a vote at the end of next month that he hopes will make travel a little easier on families. The idea is pretty simple: airlines would be required to seat families with children under 12 together when they fly on the same plane.
Without Nadler’s amendment, however, parents actually have no legal right to demand that they are allowed to sit next to their children.
Without Nadler’s amendment, however, parents actually have no legal right to demand that they are allowed to sit next to their children.
#2
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,027
A gentle preemptive moderatorly note:
From the forum's welcome thread:
cblaisd, Moderator
Travel News
From the forum's welcome thread:
One other note: sometimes travel stories are or can get intertwined with political discussions. While there is no "bright line" to point to, if your thoughts about a story are distinctly political, it would probably be better for your thread to go to OMNI/PR.
Travel News
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 8,460
For airlines like Southwest without seat choice, the family of 4 should be required to buy early bird check-in which basically guarantees that they can sit together. If they choose not to purchase it, then they're just SOL.
#4
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
I know with AA there may be plenty of seats together, but you may have to pay a seat surcharge to have them open up to you. If you want a free standard economy seat and don't have elite status, you may not be able to book adjoining seats and might only have middle seats open up for you.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
I'd actually support this kind of legislation, as it would preempt a lot of confrontations and delays. Putting the onus on the airline is fine, but that also means the airlines will have to find a way to avoid angering non-family fliers who paid for and/or reserved specific seats.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
I'd actually support this kind of legislation, as it would preempt a lot of confrontations and delays. Putting the onus on the airline is fine, but that also means the airlines will have to find a way to avoid angering non-family fliers who paid for and/or reserved specific seats.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
#8
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,490
As a parent and grandparent who has occasionally traveled with young children, I sympathize with those who are in this situation through no fault of their own, but if getting switched to a middle seat in the back and/or separated from my own spouse for an x-hour flight becomes mandated by legislation, I would add it to my list of laws that do more harm than good.
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The problem is that carriers such as AA are selling as "premium" seats which are far from that, leaving very few seats for non-elites which can be assigned in advance. Conversely, there are all kinds of other reasons why people choose the seats they choose and those people should not be bumped because they are flying solo.
I also view there as being a difference between seating families together and seating a child of UM age next to one parent. If this is a safety & security thing, there is no need for a family of 6 to be seated together. It is sufficient that there is a responsible adult to care for the child in question.
I also view there as being a difference between seating families together and seating a child of UM age next to one parent. If this is a safety & security thing, there is no need for a family of 6 to be seated together. It is sufficient that there is a responsible adult to care for the child in question.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,233
I'm okay with this but only if it's done at time of booking and seat choice. Example: Family of 4 wants to fly together. When they buy tickets, they need to view the seat map and pick 4 seats together. If they don't, or there aren't 4 seats together, then they shouldn't be able to fly together...
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
As a parent and grandparent who has occasionally traveled with young children, I sympathize with those who are in this situation through no fault of their own, but if getting switched to a middle seat in the back and/or separated from my own spouse for an x-hour flight becomes mandated by legislation, I would add it to my list of laws that do more harm than good.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
That makes a lot of sense when people end up flying on the aircraft they booked their flights on. Unfortunately, there are many reasons why this doesn't always happen. Most of those reasons come up at the last minute. I can see some merit in putting legal pressure on an airline to deal with those situations much more proactively than the "tough, sit in those seats or don't fly" attitude we so often hear. In most cases, if airlines were required to rearrange others passengers to facilitate a family continuing to sit together after an equipment change or a cancelled flight, they'd be able to do that without inconveniencing anyone except their own staff.
Make it illegal for an airline to split apart a family group with children (or any other group containing a caregiver.) There is no obligation to book them together but if they are booked together they have an obligation to preserve that in an IRROPS or plane change situation.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2010
Programs: Hilton Diamond + Marriott Gold
Posts: 70
I see a simple way to handle this:
Make it illegal for an airline to split apart a family group with children (or any other group containing a caregiver.) There is no obligation to book them together but if they are booked together they have an obligation to preserve that in an IRROPS or plane change situation.
Make it illegal for an airline to split apart a family group with children (or any other group containing a caregiver.) There is no obligation to book them together but if they are booked together they have an obligation to preserve that in an IRROPS or plane change situation.