Bloomberg: Airbus Superjumbo May See Second Life in Asian Low-Cost Markets
#1
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Bloomberg: Airbus Superjumbo May See Second Life in Asian Low-Cost Markets
Airbus A380 superjumbos being retired from premium carriers such as Singapore Airlines Ltd. may find a second life plying six- to eight-hour routes for low-cost Asian airlines, the European planemaker predicted.
Singapore Airlines and Emirates, the double-decker’s biggest customers, may return older planes back to leasing companies in the next two to three years, putting them back into the market for second-hand use, said Kiran Rao, director of strategy at Airbus.
Singapore Airlines and Emirates, the double-decker’s biggest customers, may return older planes back to leasing companies in the next two to three years, putting them back into the market for second-hand use, said Kiran Rao, director of strategy at Airbus.
Airbus says they can reconfigure these with 800 seats for a low cost carrier. Just not sure I'd want to be on board a flight with that dense a configuration (let alone the lines for the bathroom).
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
I've said it before on another thread here (to which some replied that it would never work!) that selling them into the Chinese and Indian markets for medium haul routes or specific high volume periodic routes (Haj, anyone?) would be ideal at least in theory. Interesting to see that Airbus has done the actual numbers and come to the same conclusion.
Configure them for 700-800 should not reduce seat space below where it already is in economy (the extra seats simply fill the space currently taken by J and F after all) and also involves upping the number of toilets, obviously.
Configure them for 700-800 should not reduce seat space below where it already is in economy (the extra seats simply fill the space currently taken by J and F after all) and also involves upping the number of toilets, obviously.
#3
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
I have to admit a concern about airline accidents, though, when you have that many passengers on board. Would an A380 with 800 passengers be as easily evacuated on the Hudson compared to a smaller Airbus, or, God forbid, how would we react to an accident with 800 lives lost?
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
From the beginning, I've wondered about emergency facilities at and near airports handling the A380. Would there be enough medical care available if there were an accident or at least good expertise to make effective use of available hospitals and personnel?
If used A380s will be available cheap, maybe DL will buy some if they're now considered to be proven aircraft. <joke based on DL's stated aircraft preferences>
If used A380s will be available cheap, maybe DL will buy some if they're now considered to be proven aircraft. <joke based on DL's stated aircraft preferences>
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,700
I have to admit a concern about airline accidents, though, when you have that many passengers on board. Would an A380 with 800 passengers be as easily evacuated on the Hudson compared to a smaller Airbus, or, God forbid, how would we react to an accident with 800 lives lost?
I don't think the extension of passenger jet capacity to 800 will be hindered by hypothetical bad news scenarios.
#6
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
If you look at something like the Titanic, which had a death toll of over 1,500, it's still talked about to this day, and it's been over 100 years since it sank. I would not want to be the operating carrier of an airline that loses 800 souls on board. The fact is that aircraft do crash, and in some cases the reasons are not clearly known.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,700
If you look at something like the Titanic, which had a death toll of over 1,500, it's still talked about to this day, and it's been over 100 years since it sank. I would not want to be the operating carrier of an airline that loses 800 souls on board. The fact is that aircraft do crash, and in some cases the reasons are not clearly known.
750?
650?
550?
532, plus no more than 8 infants?
#8
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,673
- 3:1 (CX) to 8:1 (LX) in F
- 12:1 (OZ) to 23:1 (LX) in C
- 35:1 (OZ) to 44:1 (KL) in Y
- ~60:1 on LCC's such as AirAsia X
It seems:
- premium Asian carriers take their passengers' comfort most seriously (CX, SQ, etc. are close behind OZ)
- Europeans are expected to hold it longer than the rest of the world
- US carriers are somewhere in between
- consider it lucky long-haul LCC's charge for drinks, otherwise such ratios would result in quite a few mishaps!
I recall ANA once advised their domestic passengers to answer nature's call before their flights (~71:1 on those high-density 773...), for everyone's comfort and the airline's benefit.
A typical 380's ~18 toilets would yield a 44:1 ratio with 800 seats, obviously too high for a LCC. I would fully expect toilets to be removed from such configurations.
#9
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan, AAdvantage
Posts: 2,100
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,700
look at that astonishing number of people! That's an ideal evacuation of 873 people. There are people helping on the ground, noone has luggage they want to gather, everyone is able bodied.... can't even imagine how it'd go with 7-800 people and the plane on fire. That's a scary, scary thought.
It was quite scary when the Asiana 777 crashed on landing at SFO and 300 people had to evacuate that plane. Therefore, should we limit 777 passengers to some amount that will make you less scared?
#11
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Malaysia Airlines already has some LON miles / low TMOH 380s ready to go, but I dont see strong interest.
This could change, imo.
As to incidents, the reaction to the two recent MHN losses, Air India and Pan Am terror bombings, and the horrendous 1977 collision of PAA and KLM 747s in Tenerife should give one a fair idea of how media and people on the ground would react.
The capability of huge losses has been offset by safety advances, but it has been demonstrated to safety regulators a 380 can be evacuated within established limits. Let's hope we never find out.
This could change, imo.
As to incidents, the reaction to the two recent MHN losses, Air India and Pan Am terror bombings, and the horrendous 1977 collision of PAA and KLM 747s in Tenerife should give one a fair idea of how media and people on the ground would react.
The capability of huge losses has been offset by safety advances, but it has been demonstrated to safety regulators a 380 can be evacuated within established limits. Let's hope we never find out.
#12
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 대한민국 (South Korea) - ex-PVG (上海)
Programs: UA MM / LT Gold (LT UC), DL SM, AA PLT (AC), OZ, KE; GE and Korean SES (like GE); Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,995
I think that Malaysia's A380s are nearing their C checks, so I would guess little interest unless they give them away. I thought I heard something that a Russian group was considering more than 800 passengers. Medium-haul Asia routes might make sense for increased capacity A380s, to keep them flying a little longer.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,445
On a positive note, an A380 that ditched on the Hudson could probably come to rest on the bottom, and folks could just stand around in the top floor, above the water line, awaiting their rescue to arrive.
Assuming, of course, that no whale swam by and attempted to mate with the stricken plane in the intervening timeframe.
Assuming, of course, that no whale swam by and attempted to mate with the stricken plane in the intervening timeframe.