CNBC: US airlines raise base fares on domestic flights
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC/Northern NJ
Programs: 1K - UAL, Platinum DL, Marriott, Hilton, SPG
Posts: 1,815
CNBC: US airlines raise base fares on domestic flights
Great job airlines.. Fuel price drop, capacity at high %, profits (from fees) are increasing across the board and let us throw in base fare increase - just to be greedy.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102105286#.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102105286#.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,571
Supply and demand sets airfares, not the cost to provide the services. Oil prices have no direct effect on air fares. Demand is up, supply is down (thanks in part to mergers), so prices go up. Not sure why this is surprising to anyone.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC/Northern NJ
Programs: 1K - UAL, Platinum DL, Marriott, Hilton, SPG
Posts: 1,815
Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: BA Gold, QF WP
Posts: 12,551
I'm not sure I agree with this statement as in 2011 airlines raised fares 4x in the 1Q to balance out fuel spikes. The same happened in 2012. They specifically added a fuel surcharge for international routes but domestic it was incremental increases to base fare.
Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
Higher costs to airlines will lead to higher prices to consumers, but lower costs airlines will not necessarily lead to lower prices to consumers.
Also remember that airlines hedge against the price of fuel, so the spot price for fuel may have reduced recently but most airlines have likely already determined the cost of their fuel for the next year or more.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
I wonder where the breakpoint is for consumers.
Last weekend I took a trip to Las Vegas, but thought the airfare, hotel, and dining to be VERY expensive. I can afford to pay $700 rt for a flight and $50 pp to dine, but I am not so sure about the average american.
Eventually, something must give: either wages go up substantially, or many will not be able to afford going on vacation anymore.
Last weekend I took a trip to Las Vegas, but thought the airfare, hotel, and dining to be VERY expensive. I can afford to pay $700 rt for a flight and $50 pp to dine, but I am not so sure about the average american.
Eventually, something must give: either wages go up substantially, or many will not be able to afford going on vacation anymore.
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I wonder where the breakpoint is for consumers.
Last weekend I took a trip to Las Vegas, but thought the airfare, hotel, and dining to be VERY expensive. I can afford to pay $700 rt for a flight and $50 pp to dine, but I am not so sure about the average american.
Eventually, something must give: either wages go up substantially, or many will not be able to afford going on vacation anymore.
Last weekend I took a trip to Las Vegas, but thought the airfare, hotel, and dining to be VERY expensive. I can afford to pay $700 rt for a flight and $50 pp to dine, but I am not so sure about the average american.
Eventually, something must give: either wages go up substantially, or many will not be able to afford going on vacation anymore.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,571
I'm not sure I agree with this statement as in 2011 airlines raised fares 4x in the 1Q to balance out fuel spikes. The same happened in 2012. They specifically added a fuel surcharge for international routes but domestic it was incremental increases to base fare.
Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
The richest 1-2% fly their own planes. Every other carrier in the US exists by the grace of the middle and lower class.
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Yet the vast majority of US households in the top 1-2% of income earners don't have a member who flies their own planes. And even a majority of US households in the top 1-2% by asset value don't have a member who flies their own planes.
Are you even familiar with how few people in the US are certificated to fly on their own in the US? Once you look into the data about such persons, it ought to become increasingly clear that many of them aren't in the top 1-2% of households by either measure.
Last edited by GUWonder; Oct 21, 2014 at 5:23 pm
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
If only it were so.
Yet the vast majority of US households in the top 1-2% of income earners don't have a member who flies their own planes. And even a majority of US households in the top 1-2% by asset value don't have a member who flies their own planes.
Are you even familiar with how few people in the US are certificated to fly on their own in the US? Once you look into the data about such persons, it ought to become increasingly clear that many of them aren't in the top 1-2% of households by either measure.
Yet the vast majority of US households in the top 1-2% of income earners don't have a member who flies their own planes. And even a majority of US households in the top 1-2% by asset value don't have a member who flies their own planes.
Are you even familiar with how few people in the US are certificated to fly on their own in the US? Once you look into the data about such persons, it ought to become increasingly clear that many of them aren't in the top 1-2% of households by either measure.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The vast majority of US households in the top 1-2% by income have no members who flew by anything but common carriers last year. The notion that the majority of even the top 1-2% of income earners fly by private planes -- assuming you are talking mainly about planes not operated by the publicly-traded common carriers in the US -- is one built on a misunderstanding of national demographics and on the annual purchase habits of US persons in the discussed income range.
#13
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PDX/HIO
Programs: AS MVPG; Hertz Pres; Tanquery Million Minier
Posts: 375
The 98th percentile by gross income makes roughly $375k. I would agree that not many people making $375k fly private. The 50th percentile makes about $40k.
I would not be surprised if airfare correlates well with macroeconomics. S&P 500 hit a record nominal high this year so I don't think it's surprising that airfares would as well.
I would not be surprised if airfare correlates well with macroeconomics. S&P 500 hit a record nominal high this year so I don't think it's surprising that airfares would as well.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
The 98th percentile by gross income makes roughly $375k. I would agree that not many people making $375k fly private. The 50th percentile makes about $40k.
I would not be surprised if airfare correlates well with macroeconomics. S&P 500 hit a record nominal high this year so I don't think it's surprising that airfares would as well.
I would not be surprised if airfare correlates well with macroeconomics. S&P 500 hit a record nominal high this year so I don't think it's surprising that airfares would as well.
#15
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,154
I couldn't even imagine doing it with kids these days. I know a guy I work with hasn't flown in quite some time because of the costs of flying his family (total of 5).
For all that the business travelers sneer at the average person that's flying, those planes aren't going anywhere unless they're on that plane too, even if they're not paying as much. There just aren't enough business travelers to fill enough seats to make it work (although I suppose the airlines could just start flying commuter planes everywhere, maybe that'd work).