Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

CNBC: US airlines raise base fares on domestic flights

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CNBC: US airlines raise base fares on domestic flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2014, 9:24 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC/Northern NJ
Programs: 1K - UAL, Platinum DL, Marriott, Hilton, SPG
Posts: 1,815
CNBC: US airlines raise base fares on domestic flights

Great job airlines.. Fuel price drop, capacity at high %, profits (from fees) are increasing across the board and let us throw in base fare increase - just to be greedy.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102105286#.
RooseveltL is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 9:31 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,571
Supply and demand sets airfares, not the cost to provide the services. Oil prices have no direct effect on air fares. Demand is up, supply is down (thanks in part to mergers), so prices go up. Not sure why this is surprising to anyone.
rjque is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 9:36 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC/Northern NJ
Programs: 1K - UAL, Platinum DL, Marriott, Hilton, SPG
Posts: 1,815
Originally Posted by rjque
Supply and demand sets airfares, not the cost to provide the services. Oil prices have no direct effect on air fares. Demand is up, supply is down (thanks in part to mergers), so prices go up. Not sure why this is surprising to anyone.
I'm not sure I agree with this statement as in 2011 airlines raised fares 4x in the 1Q to balance out fuel spikes. The same happened in 2012. They specifically added a fuel surcharge for international routes but domestic it was incremental increases to base fare.

Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
RooseveltL is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 9:48 am
  #4  
nux
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: BA Gold, QF WP
Posts: 12,551
Originally Posted by RooseveltL
I'm not sure I agree with this statement as in 2011 airlines raised fares 4x in the 1Q to balance out fuel spikes. The same happened in 2012. They specifically added a fuel surcharge for international routes but domestic it was incremental increases to base fare.

Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
This is relatively simple economics and supply/demand, and shows that airlines are not in perfect competition but closer to an oligopoly.

Higher costs to airlines will lead to higher prices to consumers, but lower costs airlines will not necessarily lead to lower prices to consumers.

Also remember that airlines hedge against the price of fuel, so the spot price for fuel may have reduced recently but most airlines have likely already determined the cost of their fuel for the next year or more.
nux is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 11:16 am
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
I wonder where the breakpoint is for consumers.
Last weekend I took a trip to Las Vegas, but thought the airfare, hotel, and dining to be VERY expensive. I can afford to pay $700 rt for a flight and $50 pp to dine, but I am not so sure about the average american.
Eventually, something must give: either wages go up substantially, or many will not be able to afford going on vacation anymore.
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 12:40 pm
  #6  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26,543
I believe that the Travel News Forum is a better fit for this thread.
Please follow there.
Thanks..
Obscure2k
TravelBuzz Moderator
obscure2k is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 12:42 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
I wonder where the breakpoint is for consumers.
Last weekend I took a trip to Las Vegas, but thought the airfare, hotel, and dining to be VERY expensive. I can afford to pay $700 rt for a flight and $50 pp to dine, but I am not so sure about the average american.
Eventually, something must give: either wages go up substantially, or many will not be able to afford going on vacation anymore.
Vacation patterns will change to include forms of vacation that the middle middle and lower middle class can afford. The richest 5% of US households will fly somewhat less for non-VFR vacations, but the richest 1-2% will fly about as much as already takes place.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 3:14 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,571
Originally Posted by RooseveltL
I'm not sure I agree with this statement as in 2011 airlines raised fares 4x in the 1Q to balance out fuel spikes. The same happened in 2012. They specifically added a fuel surcharge for international routes but domestic it was incremental increases to base fare.

Are you claiming they lied or they have since reduced airfare
Airlines charge the highest price the market will bear, regardless of their costs. They implement fare increases whenever they think the market will bear it. If fuel has recently increased in price, they will generally blame the increase on fuel costs, even though costs are not the issue. This is why you never see fares come down when fuel comes down.
rjque is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 4:45 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Vacation patterns will change to include forms of vacation that the middle middle and lower middle class can afford. The richest 5% of US households will fly somewhat less for non-VFR vacations, but the richest 1-2% will fly about as much as already takes place.
The richest 1-2% fly their own planes. Every other carrier in the US exists by the grace of the middle and lower class.
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 5:17 pm
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
The richest 1-2% fly their own planes. Every other carrier in the US exists by the grace of the middle and lower class.
If only it were so.

Yet the vast majority of US households in the top 1-2% of income earners don't have a member who flies their own planes. And even a majority of US households in the top 1-2% by asset value don't have a member who flies their own planes.

Are you even familiar with how few people in the US are certificated to fly on their own in the US? Once you look into the data about such persons, it ought to become increasingly clear that many of them aren't in the top 1-2% of households by either measure.

Last edited by GUWonder; Oct 21, 2014 at 5:23 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 5:36 pm
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by GUWonder
If only it were so.

Yet the vast majority of US households in the top 1-2% of income earners don't have a member who flies their own planes. And even a majority of US households in the top 1-2% by asset value don't have a member who flies their own planes.

Are you even familiar with how few people in the US are certificated to fly on their own in the US? Once you look into the data about such persons, it ought to become increasingly clear that many of them aren't in the top 1-2% of households by either measure.
I guess I meant private planes. Not necessarily piloting a plane or owning one.
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2014, 5:47 pm
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
I guess I meant private planes. Not necessarily piloting a plane or owning one.
The vast majority of US households in the top 1-2% by income have no members who flew by anything but common carriers last year. The notion that the majority of even the top 1-2% of income earners fly by private planes -- assuming you are talking mainly about planes not operated by the publicly-traded common carriers in the US -- is one built on a misunderstanding of national demographics and on the annual purchase habits of US persons in the discussed income range.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 12:44 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PDX/HIO
Programs: AS MVPG; Hertz Pres; Tanquery Million Minier
Posts: 375
The 98th percentile by gross income makes roughly $375k. I would agree that not many people making $375k fly private. The 50th percentile makes about $40k.

I would not be surprised if airfare correlates well with macroeconomics. S&P 500 hit a record nominal high this year so I don't think it's surprising that airfares would as well.
nookanaya is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 6:41 am
  #14  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by nookanaya
The 98th percentile by gross income makes roughly $375k. I would agree that not many people making $375k fly private. The 50th percentile makes about $40k.

I would not be surprised if airfare correlates well with macroeconomics. S&P 500 hit a record nominal high this year so I don't think it's surprising that airfares would as well.
Then where IS the breaking point for the average consumer? $500 NYC-MCO? $1000? $2000 pp?
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 11:03 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
Then where IS the breaking point for the average consumer? $500 NYC-MCO? $1000? $2000 pp?
For me it was the $900 rt from DTW to FLL that I was looking at for christmas this year. That's a fare I routinely get for $300-$350, even around holidays. I'm driving down this year and flying back (on a one-way that's still higher than my normal round trip). If I didn't have the extra days to be able to drive, I would have canceled the trip.

I couldn't even imagine doing it with kids these days. I know a guy I work with hasn't flown in quite some time because of the costs of flying his family (total of 5).

For all that the business travelers sneer at the average person that's flying, those planes aren't going anywhere unless they're on that plane too, even if they're not paying as much. There just aren't enough business travelers to fill enough seats to make it work (although I suppose the airlines could just start flying commuter planes everywhere, maybe that'd work).
piper28 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.