Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TG 747 versus TG 340 versus OZ 747 in F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2013, 11:51 am
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Benicia, California, USA
Programs: AA PLT,AS,UA PP,J6,FB,EY,LH,SQ,HH Dmd,Hyatt Glbl,Marriott Plat,IHG Plat,Accor Gold
Posts: 10,820
TG 747 versus TG 340 versus TG 380 versus OZ 747 in F

On an F award trip I'm planning for next year between Germany and China, the available options right now are TG 747, TG 340, TG380 and OZ 747. Any suggestions on which is best? Traveling with my wife, if traveling as a couple makes any difference re anyone's recommendations.

Thanks for any help!

Last edited by Thunderroad; Nov 10, 2013 at 1:01 am
Thunderroad is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2013, 1:50 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: KRS/ Norway
Programs: EBG
Posts: 307
OZ any day!
Then TG A346.

I have tried them all.
BizflyerNorway is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2013, 3:48 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SYD & 35K ft.
Programs: UA Gold, *A Gold - Qantas Club/Silver - Virgin Atlantic Silver
Posts: 1,911
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
On an F award trip I'm planning for next year between Germany and China, the available options right now are TG 747 versus TG 340 versus OZ 747. Any suggestions on which is best? Traveling with my wife.
They all sound good - it's F

With regards to the TG options, I would go for the 747 - you may get the new hard product which are cubicles, not pod based seats... The new config only has 9 seats... Just some food for thought...

Cheers,

AG. :-:
Airgroovin is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2013, 1:07 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Benicia, California, USA
Programs: AA PLT,AS,UA PP,J6,FB,EY,LH,SQ,HH Dmd,Hyatt Glbl,Marriott Plat,IHG Plat,Accor Gold
Posts: 10,820
Thanks for the useful replies, folks. In my original post, I mistakenly left out the TG 380 option. Sorry about that. Any thoughts on that option would be much appreciated.

One other, minor factor is whether we could sit across from each other in the same F suite to drink and dine together, with one of us (most likely my wife, since she's a fair amount smaller than me) on the buddy seat/footrest. I've seen a recent post here indicating that this is possible for the TG 747. Any sense of whether it is possible on the other options?

Originally Posted by BizflyerNorway
OZ any day!
Then TG A346.

I have tried them all.
Thanks! Any particular reasons you prefer OZ? And do you prefer it to TG 380 as well?

Originally Posted by Airgroovin'
They all sound good - it's F

With regards to the TG options, I would go for the 747 - you may get the new hard product which are cubicles, not pod based seats... The new config only has 9 seats... Just some food for thought...

Cheers,

AG. :-:
Thanks! Is there any way to know in advance whether it's the new hard product 747? Are the conversions to that product supposed to be completed by sometime next year (and if so, when)?
Thunderroad is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2013, 2:30 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SYD & 35K ft.
Programs: UA Gold, *A Gold - Qantas Club/Silver - Virgin Atlantic Silver
Posts: 1,911
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
Thanks for the useful replies, folks. In my original post, I mistakenly left out the TG 380 option. Sorry about that. Any thoughts on that option would be much appreciated.

One other, minor factor is whether we could sit across from each other in the same F suite to drink and dine together, with one of us (most likely my wife, since she's a fair amount smaller than me) on the buddy seat/footrest. I've seen a recent post here indicating that this is possible for the TG 747. Any sense of whether it is possible on the other options?



Thanks! Any particular reasons you prefer OZ? And do you prefer it to TG 380 as well?



Thanks! Is there any way to know in advance whether it's the new hard product 747? Are the conversions to that product supposed to be completed by sometime next year (and if so, when)?
Yes, fine to dine on TG - I would opt for the A380... No doubt!

I have also flown OZ in F and they are amazing - such hard decisions... I won't talk up OZ too much on this thread as it is a TG board!

Cheers,

AG. :-:
Airgroovin is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2013, 2:51 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: BKK
Programs: TG ROP Platinum, M&M Senator, IHG Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 8,331
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
One other, minor factor is whether we could sit across from each other in the same F suite to drink and dine together, with one of us (most likely my wife, since she's a fair amount smaller than me) on the buddy seat/footrest. I've seen a recent post here indicating that this is possible for the TG 747. Any sense of whether it is possible on the other options?
yes also possible on the A 340
BinSabai is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2013, 3:19 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Warks.England
Programs: Thai Silver,Skywards Silver,Gulf Silver, Interconti Prority Platinum, FR Priority Q!
Posts: 697
340-600

Avoid
Two sectors this year in F,disruption from galley and imho uncomfortable seats compared to 747
Give me 1A&K in F on 747 any day
SS
Silverswimmer is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2013, 3:30 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: BKK
Programs: TG ROP Platinum, M&M Senator, IHG Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 8,331
Originally Posted by Silverswimmer
Avoid
Two sectors this year in F,disruption from galley and imho uncomfortable seats compared to 747
Give me 1A&K in F on 747 any day
SS
3 times return this year in F on A340 and I like it!
some of the 747 by the way have the same F seats! (those with 10 seats)
I feel like in a cage in the so called F suites!
BinSabai is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2013, 4:52 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: KRS/ Norway
Programs: EBG
Posts: 307
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
Thanks! Any particular reasons you prefer OZ? And do you prefer it to TG 380 as well?
I like their suites. Private but still you can observe whats happening in the cabin. The food is fare better then on TG. As is their champagne & wines. Service is excellent. On TG its up & down.

On the other end, TG is far better on ground with buggy service and escorts wich OZ dont have. TG F lounge in BKK is slightly better then OZ F in ICN. In FRA they use the same lounge (Senator B)

The OZ departure time from FRA (19:00) is very good so you really can enjoy the evening in F and have a good sleep.

TG wins on the ground service at their home base. And have a better cognac served onboard. Besides that OZ is better.

The reason I prefer TG F on 346 over 744 is that on 346 there is only 8 seats, when the 744 have 9 or 10. I feel it gives more of a private jeg feeling then the 744. Its a big chance to take wether you got the new seats on the or not. And you can never be sure before you are on board.

However, you will be sure about what to expect on the 380. But with 12 seats and if all seats are taken, the feeling of exclusivity is far from what you feel in the 346.

But if I could, I would choose the departure with fewest pax in the F cabin. There is no such thing as an F flight with yourself beeing alone in the cabin, or only 1 or 2 other pax.

Whatever you take, it will be a nice experience for you!
You could also consider ANA to NRT. Their F product is also excellent.

Happy flying!
BizflyerNorway is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2013, 7:59 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by Airgroovin'
Yes, fine to dine on TG - I would opt for the A380... No doubt!

I have also flown OZ in F and they are amazing - such hard decisions... I won't talk up OZ too much on this thread as it is a TG board!

Cheers,

AG. :-:
I completely disagree. The TG A380 F seats aren't suites and they are in terrible shape (lots of scratches all over) or at least that was the case on my recent FRA - BKK flight. On the other hand, the new TG 744 F suites are fantastic.
fly747first is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2013, 8:07 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: YVR, KUL
Programs: AC, MH, BA, AF-KL
Posts: 2,904
Originally Posted by BizflyerNorway
TG F lounge in BKK is slightly better then OZ F in ICN
The TG F lounge is miles ahead of the OZ F. I'd hardly call the latter an F lounge at all - it's just marginally better than the mediocre J lounge.
SilverChris is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2013, 1:43 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by SilverChris
The TG F lounge is miles ahead of the OZ F. I'd hardly call the latter an F lounge at all - it's just marginally better than the mediocre J lounge.
Very true
fly747first is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2013, 2:33 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SYD & 35K ft.
Programs: UA Gold, *A Gold - Qantas Club/Silver - Virgin Atlantic Silver
Posts: 1,911
Originally Posted by fly747first
I completely disagree. The TG A380 F seats aren't suites and they are in terrible shape (lots of scratches all over) or at least that was the case on my recent FRA - BKK flight. On the other hand, the new TG 744 F suites are fantastic.
I actually make the point both are great... I'm not that overly fussy right up the front.

The reason why I state go for the A380 option is that the A380 is TG's flagship new iron bird... I'm certain it will not be long and the new TG 747 9F cabin will show wear and tear...? For the experience, in this case, I would opt for the A380, personally. Just sayin'.

Cheers,

AG. :-:

Last edited by Airgroovin; Nov 13, 2013 at 2:21 am
Airgroovin is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2013, 10:00 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 855
I posted a "TG F class or OZ F class" question in the *A forum.
Any feedback is welcomed
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/star-...l#post21777924

Last edited by 26point2orbust; Nov 13, 2013 at 7:14 pm
26point2orbust is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2013, 6:39 pm
  #15  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,884
Is it a one way trip?

If a round trip why not to fly with OZ one way and with TG the other. I would choose A380. I was on the inaugural A380 ex CDG in F - you can view my pictures by clicking on this link: https://picasaweb.google.com/1001229...eat=directlink

Link to the pictures from an OZ flight ICN-FRA: https://picasaweb.google.com/1001229...eat=directlink

I would choose OZ ex FRA and TG ex China with a long layover in BKK to experience the F-lounge.

If you cannot mix and match, I would go with OZ purely because of the fantastic in-flight service standards. I wouldn't say OZ F-class lounge is bad - it is not as good as TG lounge, but has all the basics including champagne, reasonably good food etc. The main difference are that OZ lounge is self service (does not really bother me), while TG lounge has attendants that would bring you the stuff plus OZ lounge does not have individual 'living rooms'. For the escort - I always skip the buggy part and go to the gate myself - so no differences between OZ and TG for me.
TPJ is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.