Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Starwood | Starwood Preferred Guest
Reload this Page >

Concerning Behavior re: PLAT Upgrade at W Union Square (NYC)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Concerning Behavior re: PLAT Upgrade at W Union Square (NYC)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2015, 6:55 pm
  #46  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by m0hamed
Agree or disagree Platinum Concierge said the property can withhold all benefits until the Platinum guest arrives, which at the time included the suite upgrade, Internet and club access hence my partner waiting in the lobby.

Just because most properties don't practice this way, does not negate what Platinum Concierge states, combined with the other reports here.

In reality, it doesn't affect most but when it does it is very inconvenient.
So some Plat Concierge told you this at some point and you now take it as gospel? Reminds me of UA agents... I have heard some true whoppers from them.

I'll continue to take the reality of my own experience plus apparently hundreds of other examples by other Plat FTers at likely dozens of different properties.

Such a rule (published or not) would be asinine by SPG. They're smarter than that.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2015, 8:01 pm
  #47  
Hyatt 10+ BadgeFour Seasons 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP (OWE), VA PLAT, EY GLD, SPG PLAT, Hyatt DIA, Hilton DIA, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,527
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
So some Plat Concierge told you this at some point and you now take it as gospel? Reminds me of UA agents... I have heard some true whoppers from them.

I'll continue to take the reality of my own experience plus apparently hundreds of other examples by other Plat FTers at likely dozens of different properties.

Such a rule (published or not) would be asinine by SPG. They're smarter than that.
You are free to believe whatever you like, however my experience included several calls to Platinum Concierge and involving Starwood Corporate Care both of which confirmed the property's stance.
m0hamed is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2015, 9:26 am
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by m0hamed
You are free to believe whatever you like, however my experience included several calls to Platinum Concierge and involving Starwood Corporate Care both of which confirmed the property's stance.
You may huff and puff about a single rogue property, but since a rule, by definition, is typically 1) published and 2) widely followed, and this is neither - it's not a "rule". :-:
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2015, 9:28 am
  #49  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Delta - Gold; Starwood - Platinum; HHonors - Diamond & Avis Preferred
Posts: 10,869
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
You may huff and puff about a single rogue property, but since a rule, by definition, is typically 1) published and 2) widely followed, and this is neither - it's not a "rule". :-:
Agreed!
KENNECTED is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2015, 7:35 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tokyo
Programs: SPG LT Plat ANA Plat
Posts: 596
If you check carefully you will see that Plat benefits only apply when the Plat is staying at the hotel, so offically if the guest checks in before the plat then benefits should not be extended, however this rearly happens as of course most properties understand the benefit ( to them also ) to extend the benefits. However the rule is there to stop Pltas making bookings for others and not showing up.

I have experience have my wife was denied any benefits until I turned up, I also have cases where she and a friend and my daughter spent 3 nights in a hotel without me even being in the same country and getting full Plat benefits.

As mentioned there is no rule to my knoweldge saying no benefits if Plat is not there, however you will see thet the benefits are available to plats in residence. Just because the rule is often ignored does not make it no existant.
BRITINJAPAN3 is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2015, 8:04 pm
  #51  
Four Seasons 5+ BadgeHyatt 10+ Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP (OWE), VA PLAT, EY GLD, SPG PLAT, Hyatt DIA, Hilton DIA, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,527
Originally Posted by BRITINJAPAN3
Just because the rule is often ignored does not make it no existant.
Precisely.
m0hamed is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 12:18 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,884
Originally Posted by m0hamed
Agree or disagree Platinum Concierge said the property can withhold all benefits until the Platinum guest arrives, which at the time included the suite upgrade, Internet and club access hence my partner waiting in the lobby.

Just because most properties don't practice this way, does not negate what Platinum Concierge states, combined with the other reports here.

In reality, it doesn't affect most but when it does it is very inconvenient.
m0hamed, I have had this happen a few times in the past. I have a contact at Starwood Corporate who had someone check on it and get back to me.

They explained platinum benefits are for platinum members when staying in the hotel, and not for rooms booked by a platinum member who may not even be staying in the hotel. For this reason, some hotels have a stricter policy that upgraded rooms will only be given out when (and in some cases if) the platinum member arrives. This is to better accommodate platinum members in residence. However, once the platinum member arrives all benefits should be made available. Room upgrades are always on a space available basis. She went on to explain that my late arrival in the evening could effectively lower my chances of an upgrade if the hotel decided not to give the upgraded room to my partner and she has seen this multiple times for some hotels when they are fully booked.

It makes sense to me. While I have never booked a hotel room in my name for someone else to use, I can understand that others would. At the end of the day, a complimentary upgrade is just that. I never expect it and make the effort to smile when I do get one.
uanj is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 12:49 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: AUH
Posts: 8,267
The question of whether Plat benefits should be offered before the Plat member arrives should probably be spun off into a separate thread, as we seem to now have two pages' worth of discussion solely on that topic.
Originally Posted by sts603
Check-in rep told her no suites, she could either take a bigger room on a lower for or a similar size room high up away from the noise. I told her to take what she wanted and I would check with them in 45 minutes when I arrived.
[...]
She offers an Accessible Fantastic Suite but on the 5th floor (so noisy). I declined
The hotel is supposed to offer you an upgrade to a Standard Suite, of course subject to availability. By all accounts they did, certainly by the time you arrived - an unspecified "bigger room" on a lower floor on the first occasion, and a Fantastic Suite the second time, albeit on a floor which you didn't like. This sounds very much like an upgrade exactly as per T&Cs. Which you declined. You and your wife made a choice.

They are not obliged to keep finding you different rooms for upgrade until they find one you're 100% happy with. You're checking in for a hotel stay, not looking for your next dream home.

The question of whether Corner Suites were specialty suites, and therefore inside or outside of the Platinum upgrade pool, can probably be answered easily as a matter of fact. Your personal opinion as to whether these should or shouldn't be part of the upgrade pool is, in this case, completely irrelevant.

And even if the Corner Suites were not a specialty suite, you are going back to the perennial question of: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/starw...hlight=upgrade
stargold is online now  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 12:54 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAH
Programs: Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist, DL Plat, UA Silver
Posts: 4,043
OP I'm totally with you on this one. The others doubting, I truly disagree with them.

This is like a scam many SPG properties like to pull overseas particularly in Asia.

It's a principal problem that the hotel lied to you straight out. If they were smart they could have re-worded it and said it differently. However upfront lying to a customer is uncalled for!

I hope you have screen shot'd the inventory from your phone so you can prove SPG the time & date.
-----------------

On the side note, NY Times square lies about their inventory too! They will tell you that they oversold on suites and would bump an upgraded guest down should they sell a room.
However selling it at that price, I highly doubt it.
TennisNoob is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 1:03 am
  #55  
Four Seasons 5+ BadgeHyatt 10+ Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP (OWE), VA PLAT, EY GLD, SPG PLAT, Hyatt DIA, Hilton DIA, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,527
Originally Posted by uanj
m0hamed, I have had this happen a few times in the past. I have a contact at Starwood Corporate who had someone check on it and get back to me.

They explained platinum benefits are for platinum members when staying in the hotel, and not for rooms booked by a platinum member who may not even be staying in the hotel. For this reason, some hotels have a stricter policy that upgraded rooms will only be given out when (and in some cases if) the platinum member arrives. This is to better accommodate platinum members in residence. However, once the platinum member arrives all benefits should be made available. Room upgrades are always on a space available basis. She went on to explain that my late arrival in the evening could effectively lower my chances of an upgrade if the hotel decided not to give the upgraded room to my partner and she has seen this multiple times for some hotels when they are fully booked.

It makes sense to me. While I have never booked a hotel room in my name for someone else to use, I can understand that others would. At the end of the day, a complimentary upgrade is just that. I never expect it and make the effort to smile when I do get one.
Thank you. I have no idea why others are intent on arguing Starwood Corporate's explanation of it.
m0hamed is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 1:04 am
  #56  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Originally Posted by uanj
m0hamed, I have had this happen a few times in the past. I have a contact at Starwood Corporate who had someone check on it and get back to me.

They explained platinum benefits are for platinum members when staying in the hotel, and not for rooms booked by a platinum member who may not even be staying in the hotel. For this reason, some hotels have a stricter policy that upgraded rooms will only be given out when (and in some cases if) the platinum member arrives. This is to better accommodate platinum members in residence. However, once the platinum member arrives all benefits should be made available. Room upgrades are always on a space available basis. She went on to explain that my late arrival in the evening could effectively lower my chances of an upgrade if the hotel decided not to give the upgraded room to my partner and she has seen this multiple times for some hotels when they are fully booked.

It makes sense to me. While I have never booked a hotel room in my name for someone else to use, I can understand that others would. At the end of the day, a complimentary upgrade is just that. I never expect it and make the effort to smile when I do get one.
I wish every Starwood hotel would strictly enforce the rule of no Plat benefits before the Plat guest arrives. It's not fair to others who have earned their Plat status to lose benefits to the spouses/SOs/friends/relatives of Plats when the Plat has no intention of making an appearance to stay at the property on the date in question. I suspect that a nontrivial number of Plats try to cheat the system this way.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 1:16 am
  #57  
Four Seasons 5+ BadgeHyatt 10+ Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP (OWE), VA PLAT, EY GLD, SPG PLAT, Hyatt DIA, Hilton DIA, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,527
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
I wish every Starwood hotel would strictly enforce the rule of no Plat benefits before the Plat guest arrives. It's not fair to others who have earned their Plat status to lose benefits to the spouses/SOs/friends/relatives of Plats when the Plat has no intention of making an appearance to stay at the property on the date in question. I suspect that a nontrivial number of Plats try to cheat the system this way.
That is clear from several posters in this thread alone.
m0hamed is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 3:24 am
  #58  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: Everything is refundable
Posts: 3,727
Originally Posted by TennisNoob
OP I'm totally with you on this one. The others doubting, I truly disagree with them.

This is like a scam many SPG properties like to pull overseas particularly in Asia.

It's a principal problem that the hotel lied to you straight out. If they were smart they could have re-worded it and said it differently. However upfront lying to a customer is uncalled for!

I hope you have screen shot'd the inventory from your phone so you can prove SPG the time & date.
-----------------

On the side note, NY Times square lies about their inventory too! They will tell you that they oversold on suites and would bump an upgraded guest down should they sell a room.
However selling it at that price, I highly doubt it.
You do not understand how the system works...

Suites are pre-assigned for certain Plat. members and remain available for sale until this particular Platinum member checks in, so theoretically until early a.m.

Very very simply (but still dynamic) approach.
FD1971 is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 8:36 am
  #59  
Company Representative - Starwood
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Austin, Texas
Programs: Marriott Employee Level
Posts: 31,593
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Maybe the Lurkers can chime in at some point here, would be greatly appreciated ^
For any elite member benefits to be given, the elite member must be present. If you have experienced anything differently, then those properties have chosen to ignore this caveat and manage it differently.

Best regards,

William R. Sanders
Social Media Specialist
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide

[email protected]
Starwood Lurker is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 8:36 am
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Florida
Programs: AA LTG (EXP), Hilton Silver (Dia), Marriott LTP (PP), SPG LTG (P) > MPG LTPP
Posts: 11,329
Originally Posted by TennisNoob
...It's a principal problem that the hotel lied to you straight out. If they were smart they could have re-worded it and said it differently. However upfront lying to a customer is uncalled for!

I hope you have screen shot'd the inventory from your phone so you can prove SPG the time & date.
-----------------

On the side note, NY Times square lies about their inventory too! They will tell you that they oversold on suites and would bump an upgraded guest down should they sell a room.
However selling it at that price, I highly doubt it.
As stated many times on just about every hotel forum, the online inventory does not match actual inventory. Using what you see online to force a property to upgrade you is nothing short of bullying and should not be done. Reporting the situation to corporate if you feel you've been wronged is appropriate. They can investigate the situation and advise the property to correct their practices.

Yes, we all want upgrades when we arrive. Being the one denied is frustrating. But it's a known fact properties will oversell to deal with no shows. Sometimes rooms go out of inventory for maintenance reasons (who hasn't been in a room that should not have been in use). Sometimes guests will stay over (I've had to do this for medical reasons). Every chain has walk policies that attempt to make up for the inconvenience and some are very good. Getting the property to pay up may be a challenge.

Personally, I encourage properties to sell their suites whenever they can and I will forego my upgrade in those situations. I understand they are in business to make money and not to be holding a suite for my use should I show up. I do expect them to deal honestly with me but know DYKWIA's causes them to exaggerate things from time to time.
RogerD408 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.