Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > Star Alliance
Reload this Page >

MIA-IST-BKK on Turkish or MIA-ZRH-BKK on Swiss? Business Class

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

MIA-IST-BKK on Turkish or MIA-ZRH-BKK on Swiss? Business Class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2016, 7:33 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Programs: AA (PLATINUM), HHonors (DIAMOND)
Posts: 1,068
MIA-IST-BKK on Turkish or MIA-ZRH-BKK on Swiss? Business Class

I have the option of MIA-IST-BKK on Turkish or MIA-ZRH-BKK on Swiss. Both options are Business Class. Two adults and one child. We flew on Swiss once and loved it, however the Zurich Panarama lounge was a bit week. Both options have nearly identical layover. Soft Product is our #1 priority. Thank you in advance for your help.
flyer121 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 7:40 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NBO/ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 188
FWIW, LX lounge in ZRH is recently renovated and absolutely gorgeous.
symphonicman is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 8:04 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 9,122
Stick with what you love. Also ZRH is a much better option in case of miss-connect.
erik123 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 8:13 am
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Programs: AA (PLATINUM), HHonors (DIAMOND)
Posts: 1,068
TK soft product and IST lounge looks pretty impressive.
flyer121 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 8:46 am
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Programs: AA (PLATINUM), HHonors (DIAMOND)
Posts: 1,068
Another option could be Austrian via Viana, however the layover is several hours.

Last edited by flyer121; Sep 10, 2016 at 9:00 am
flyer121 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 9:40 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Florida
Programs: UA Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 276
I'd avoid Turkey for the time being.
Seby12 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 9:43 am
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
The seats on TK are longer and more comfortable and the food is much better.

OTOH, if anything goes wrong, you really don't want to be dealing with TK.

IST lounge has much better food than LX ZRH, but the transfer experience will be much more civilized at ZRH.

I'd call this one a toss-up.
Kacee is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 9:45 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Programs: AA PLT the rest, Kettle Power
Posts: 667
I'd go with TK, better seat/bed, better food/service, better lounge layover. One possibly problematic negative - IIROPS sometimes aren't so great.
TGGDEL is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 10:14 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: exUA1K, UA MM, lifetime UA1P, AA MM, HH Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,731
I've done a few Business class trips on TK connecting through IST.

Sure, TK has good food and a great lounge.

BUT the IST airport is an overcrowded circus at best. Gates are way too small with odd procedures.

My last trip through IST featured a very late inbound on TK that allowed no time for the lounge or much needed shower. However, I was relieved that I did not have to deal with the famous TK agents for re-accommodation if my incoming flight was even later.

Getting a second glass of wine on TK can take much effort sometimes. White wines are not chilled. Sometimes they just don't get it.

Some of the DOCO onboard staff are great. Some are so lazy.

The bottom line:

I prefer the civility of ZRH and LX.
roberto99 is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 10:49 am
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
Originally Posted by roberto99
The bottom line:

I prefer the civility of ZRH and LX.
If you are not a German speaker or an HON/SEN, LX service tends to be extremely cold. As if they would really prefer you chose another airline. At least that's my experience.

But they are efficient. And ZRH is a very civilized transfer.
Kacee is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 11:38 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,635
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/star-...ess-class.html

For me, safety factor would come into play, but YMMV...
curt is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 6:37 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Programs: M&M SEN, Amex Plat, Club Carlson, Marriott, HHonors & Accor Gold, Velocity Silver, Qantas Bronze
Posts: 3,767
Current political situation in Turkey would be decisive factor for me, i.e. I'd go for LX.
vbroucek is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2016, 9:46 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
ZRH-BKK can be on the new LX 77W which has an even nicer looking Business class. I already like LX's J product and TK has a good one too but I'd want to try the new product.
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 6:23 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: GOT
Posts: 1,167
IF soft product is #1 priority then TK is likely the winner. They've been on a real charm offensive recently and came out on top of the Skytrax awards.
SocialAdept is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 3:07 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA *G 1MM LT United Club & Global Entry
Posts: 2,756
In your situation the TK 3-across 777 seating in biz might be advantageous. Keeps your group seated together if that is important.

Otherwise for a myriad of reasons I would go with LX.


SL
SunLover is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.