Southwest Gets New IT System for Many Changes
#32
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,872
Point to point routes isn't a problem for assigned seating on legacy carriers. It's not always simple A-B-A. Here's what a random DL 757 has done in the last few days - all legs with First cabins, Comfort+ section, coach and assigned seats:
That's Delta N540US. Props to FlightAware.
That's Delta N540US. Props to FlightAware.
#33
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,933
#34
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dallas, TX, AA 3MM EXP, WN
Posts: 1,808
First steps first. They can't make that option, that I can see, without doing assigned seating first. Reason: If everyone can sit wherever they want, what's the point in having a different section with fewer seats in the same space if no one can pay for it and be guaranteed that they'll sit there.
AirTran had assigned seating, didn't they?
And they also have to have a predictable plane configuration on a given route. That's hard when the planes fly points A to point B to point C to point D to point E to point F with a mix of shorter and longer legs over the course of a day.
The legacy airlines are able to have a predictable plane configuration because a lot of their spoke flights are hub A to spoke B to hub A to spoke B to hub A to spoke B all day long, ie, the same plane is flying the same route back and forth often.
AirTran had assigned seating, didn't they?
And they also have to have a predictable plane configuration on a given route. That's hard when the planes fly points A to point B to point C to point D to point E to point F with a mix of shorter and longer legs over the course of a day.
The legacy airlines are able to have a predictable plane configuration because a lot of their spoke flights are hub A to spoke B to hub A to spoke B to hub A to spoke B all day long, ie, the same plane is flying the same route back and forth often.
#35
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,512
Not in my experience. One agent works multiple flights at AA (and others). Upgrades don't involve a PA call to the counter.
#36
Join Date: Oct 2007
Programs: AA, WN, UA, Bonvoy, Hertz
Posts: 2,491
I also was surprised how many examples of limitations were provided. I think AA (particular LUS in the 'home Southwest' PHX-based area) does a very aggressive planning with daily flight variability based on demand scheduling.
Also, Southwest heavily advertises on kayak when one of its routes matches a search, so I don't see why fare comparison would be a problem at some point soon.
Rasheed
Also, Southwest heavily advertises on kayak when one of its routes matches a search, so I don't see why fare comparison would be a problem at some point soon.
Rasheed
#37
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
First steps first. They can't make that option, that I can see, without doing assigned seating first. Reason: If everyone can sit wherever they want, what's the point in having a different section with fewer seats in the same space if no one can pay for it and be guaranteed that they'll sit there.
AirTran had assigned seating, didn't they?
AirTran had assigned seating, didn't they?
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
Southwest's point-to-point extreme makes it less predictable which version of the 737 you will get on a particular flight. Which makes assigned seating difficult if the seat map is different for every version of the 737 Southwest flies.
While legacy airlines may do a bit of point to point, they don't do it to the degree where they mess up which kind of plane is on a given route (and thus make assigned seating a total mess to clear up at the gate). Plane changes only happen in rare cases.
But until Southwest gets the consistency to be able to tell you exactly which "flavor" of 737 you'll be flying in at booking time, and have that overwhelmingly turn out to be true by the time you board, Southwest will have trouble doing assigned seats (at least without blocking out sizeable parts of the plane) because of the different seating maps on the different "flavors" of the 737.
That consistency is much easier if the same planes fly a limited number of routes all the time, rather than each plane "randomly" getting circulated all around the country.
Southwest's policy of flying only 737s, but flying almost all "flavors" of the 737 semi-interchangeably, is very much tied to their open seating policy. With open seating, all that matters is the number of seats (and little differences in that can be soaked up by last minute changes by some passengers not showing up and other passengers standing by.
#39
Join Date: Oct 2001
Programs: LTP, PP
Posts: 8,700
I used to book SW "business select" and got to choose one of those sweet Business Class seats and collect the SW points. It was sweet while it lasted. That was certainly an example of a system limitation workaround or a bridge.
Despite the name calling above, I still contend WN could do things to mitigate "the IT limitations" it has. Data is data, might take a big effort to do so but its possible. I had a CIO like this from 2004-2010 where budgets, org chart power, headcount & the latest equipment meant much more then getting it done!
Despite the name calling above, I still contend WN could do things to mitigate "the IT limitations" it has. Data is data, might take a big effort to do so but its possible. I had a CIO like this from 2004-2010 where budgets, org chart power, headcount & the latest equipment meant much more then getting it done!
Last edited by joshua362; Dec 13, 2017 at 1:06 pm
#40
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,933
737 Status
73W - LED mood lighting, soft bulkhead between Y anf F
738 - New AVOD, LED mood lighting, 7 rows of C+, soft bulkhead between Y and F, updated lavs, ISP in all seats.
73H - Mod; LED mood lighting, 7 rows of C+, soft bulkhead between Y and F, updated lavs, ISP in all seats.
739 - scimitar winglets, Sat TV
73W - LED mood lighting, soft bulkhead between Y anf F
738 - New AVOD, LED mood lighting, 7 rows of C+, soft bulkhead between Y and F, updated lavs, ISP in all seats.
73H - Mod; LED mood lighting, 7 rows of C+, soft bulkhead between Y and F, updated lavs, ISP in all seats.
739 - scimitar winglets, Sat TV
Current configurations:
757 – F24W20Y136 (PMDL, standard domestic 757, overhead TVs, WiFi)
75X – F26W26Y132 (PMDL, ex-Song, has AVOD/Sat TV, WiFi) *Only 1 aircraft left in this configuration, N684DA (684)*
75S – C16W44Y108 (PMDL, International/JFK-CA, flatbeds in C, Satellite WiFi, PTVs)
75D – F20W29Y150 (AVOD/Sat TV, ISP, WiFi, new lavs/galleys/bins/PSUs/LED lighting and winglets)
75H – F20W29Y150 (AVOD/Sat TV, ISP, Satellite WiFi, new lavs/galleys/bins/PSUs/LED lighting, winglets and ETOPS)
75G – F20W21Y128 (WiFi, winglets, new lavs, ETOPS, old bins, no IFE/ISP)
75C – F72 (NBA/Charter configuration)
Historical configurations:
75A – F24W18Y132 (PMNW, “Interport”, overhead TVs, no WiFi) - all 6 converted to 75H
75E – C16W25Y130 (PMDL, International/JFK-CA, recliners in C, WiFi, PTVs) - all converted to 75S
75M - F22W18Y141 (PMNW, WiFi) - all converted to 75D (5650-5657) or 75H (5639-5643, 5648-5649).
75N – F22W19Y141 (PMNW, WiFi) - all retired
75V – F22W21Y132 (PMDL, ex-ATA/SQ, primarily on Hawaii routes, overhead TVs, WiFi) - all retired
757 – F24W20Y136 (PMDL, standard domestic 757, overhead TVs, WiFi)
75X – F26W26Y132 (PMDL, ex-Song, has AVOD/Sat TV, WiFi) *Only 1 aircraft left in this configuration, N684DA (684)*
75S – C16W44Y108 (PMDL, International/JFK-CA, flatbeds in C, Satellite WiFi, PTVs)
75D – F20W29Y150 (AVOD/Sat TV, ISP, WiFi, new lavs/galleys/bins/PSUs/LED lighting and winglets)
75H – F20W29Y150 (AVOD/Sat TV, ISP, Satellite WiFi, new lavs/galleys/bins/PSUs/LED lighting, winglets and ETOPS)
75G – F20W21Y128 (WiFi, winglets, new lavs, ETOPS, old bins, no IFE/ISP)
75C – F72 (NBA/Charter configuration)
Historical configurations:
75A – F24W18Y132 (PMNW, “Interport”, overhead TVs, no WiFi) - all 6 converted to 75H
75E – C16W25Y130 (PMDL, International/JFK-CA, recliners in C, WiFi, PTVs) - all converted to 75S
75M - F22W18Y141 (PMNW, WiFi) - all converted to 75D (5650-5657) or 75H (5639-5643, 5648-5649).
75N – F22W19Y141 (PMNW, WiFi) - all retired
75V – F22W21Y132 (PMDL, ex-ATA/SQ, primarily on Hawaii routes, overhead TVs, WiFi) - all retired
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
How many of those have different seating configurations because the lighting was changed or the WiFi was changed?
It's only differences in seating configurations that matters to how easy it is for the system to know at booking time exactly how what assignable seats there will be on the airplane you fly when you fly it.
It's exit rows I would want to reserve on Southwest planes, if Southwest had assigned seating with existing planes. The exit rows are differently configured on different Southwest planes. And I see no way at present to know which of those configurations my plane will have at the time I book it. The only reason it doesn't matter at present is because Southwest has open seating instead of assigned seating.
#42
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,933
https://www.delta.com/content/www/en.../Aircraft.html
There are definitely some differences in where the exit row is and whether it's 2 or 3 for example.
#43
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego, Ca
Programs: AA 2MM LT PLT; AS MVP Gold75k; HHonors Diamond; IHG PLT
Posts: 3,502
#44
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego, Ca
Programs: AA 2MM LT PLT; AS MVP Gold75k; HHonors Diamond; IHG PLT
Posts: 3,502
#45
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LAX/SMF/PDX/HNL
Programs: Hilton-lifetime diamond, Southwest A+, companion pass
Posts: 1,748
Just wanted to rub it in.
I posted this on July 2, in response to the banner announcement that Southwest was going to upgrade its IT systems and thereby increase its profits by $1/2 billion.